View Single Post
Old 01-06-2014, 12:45 PM #23
Lostie!'s Avatar
Lostie! Lostie! is offline
Namaste
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 26,439


Lostie! Lostie! is offline
Namaste
Lostie!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 26,439


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy View Post
Im not materialistic, I dont need the latest gadgets to keep in touch with those I care about, nor do I need to impress anyone ,in fact I think its all pretty sad that folk have to have the latest, dearest, things to fill their empty lives with ,and how do doleys,children afford them ?
That's quite a lot of assumptions to make based on something as simple as the phone one has. Is there a reason you're so angry about it?

I have one, but not because "I need the latest gadgets", because I intend to keep it for a good long while if it remains in useable condition, I love it, it's perfect for me and I don't see the need to replace it. Even though a newer model has recently been released. Sure, it's fairly recent as far as phones go, but it's not "the latest gadget".

I'm also not materialistic. I have the phone I have because it's fun. I don't walk down the street waving it around like it's a trophy.

And yeah, my life is not empty. Even if it was, I'm pretty sure a bloody mobile phone wouldn't change that.

I think it's ironic you gloat about how you're not materialistic, don't feel the need to impress people, etc, yet refer to people on benefits with a derogatory term like "doleys" (despite knowing nothing about individual circumstances), etc. That's pretty damn shallow, itself. You might not need the latest phone to feel good about yourself, you need to put others down instead.

PS: I agree that some people are materialistic and shallow in regards to phones, having the latest things, etc, but you're generalizing every single person with a Smartphone as being part of that group, which is way off.

Last edited by Lostie!; 01-06-2014 at 12:51 PM.
Lostie! is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote