Quote:
Originally Posted by Ammi
...wearing a bathrobe is not provocative at all and even though it's irrelevant, there may have been reasons why she was naked underneath/she may just have got out of the shower etc and Jeremy being sick became a priority over putting anything else on because she was trying to help him...
|
I did a "Makvelli" I not actually in bed yet.. Listen..lets cut the crap and get to the facts.
1.She was naked under that robe.. No matter what you say.
2. He was off his face with drink (Not in a position to make true judgements of situations)
3. she leant in toward him like (He thought she was coming onto him)
4. he made a harmless ( MISJUDGED advance no body touching was involved) and I think Chloe overreacted. Just my opinion.
5. being dressed the way she was is not irrelevant. (as a heterosexual man if I see a page 3 capable girl dressed the way she was as close to me as that sorry but I am going to be a bit wel,l attracted .. I am only human)