Quote:
Originally Posted by ThriceShy
It isn't a "TV contract". It is a contract. Contracts are legal or they aren't. And if money is involved then they will be legal.
Contracts have to be enforceable. A contract which doesn't say who will pay you is not enforceable.
Let us dabble in a small hypothetical...
Imagine Aisleyne wasn't paid the money by ITV. What would she do then? Would her "contract" help her if it didn't contain the details of the party that were meant to pay her?
Here are the words of Judge Rinder himself:
http://www.legalcheek.com/2014/08/ex...ality-tv-star/
See what he says? Stringent compliance regime by ofcom!
You really think it isn't going to be made clear to participants when/if they will be paid and who will pay them?
Sorry, but you have embarrassed yourself here.
marc was absolutely in the right. And Danny knows it too judging by this tweet:
https://twitter.com/dannypaul12341/s...27972756287488
And here, the defence case rests.  |
Read into it all you want, my only point was that Marc has no idea. And that I genuinely believe aisleyne didn't know the ins and outs of behind the scenes.. I still don't despite your research! It only proves what you already thought inside your own mind