Quote:
Originally Posted by just thinkin
i did..and I agree.
but the minute they threw the four safe people out two weeks into the show, who weren't nominated and who were safe.... I knew not to trust anything about the editing of the show. If you remember chloe did not even feature in those two weeks - now she seems to be the villain of the series (she's not). If she was that argumentative during the whole 8 weeks, then the other housemates would not like her - she's the only housemate that the all DO like however, and has barely been nominated by anyone - she would be safe this week also only for nasty nick buying his way to the final and selling her out.
Soo... in conclusion - if everybody in the house loves chloe - she must be doing something great and they all like her - if they are suddenly showing her being argumentative this week, you need to look at what they are not showing......the rest of them being argumentative a lot more. After all if she's the nicest in the house and she's being 'bold' now, what does it say about the others.
delighted she walks away with some money.
|
This is what I mean.
If the housemates were seeing what we were seeing, they'd hate Chloe, but they don't, so we're obviously not getting to see the nicer side of Chloe and that's what pisses me off the most. She was unfairly nominated to stop Jack from going home and making the final week boring. It's not even worth complaining to Ch5, they don't listen to the complaints. On BOTS whenever somebody complains, Rylan snatches to mic off of them and walks off. It's silly behaviour, and they're just trying to avoid confrontation. Reminds me of David Cameron tbh.