Quote:
Originally Posted by Josy
I don't get that though, if you take away the key, the bullets etc, pretty much any questionable pieces of evidence that Lenk 'found' then what's left that can prove he murdered her without reasonable doubt?
You go back to the main point of having no blood or any dna at all of Theresa's in either of the places she was supposed to have been injured and then murdered.
A DA not seeing any wrong with the evidence during that court case is actually worrying.
|
Well, the fact that Brendans statement was not part of Steves trial and that Steve was found innocent of the second charge means that they didn't really suggest where he killed her or if he raped her or not just that he was the one who killed her.
I also read somewhere (again I'm not knowing if what I read is true or not) that the reason they're so sure that the pit outside Steves was where the body was burned was because they found wire from the tyres burned there mixed in with her bones. Also, that the bone found in the Quarry was never actually proven conclusively to be Teresas or even 100% certain to be human bone?
Oh also, I read that they did prove that the bullet they found was fired from Steves gun