Quote:
Originally Posted by Niamh.
Well, I can't say I'm shocked at that revelation. The only thing I was ever shocked at about that case is that the judge bought his story first time round..........
|
It's been a farce, it's not even a lack of evidence issue... the scene is almost self-explanatory. Basically because of the massive (and somewhat justified) paranoia surrounding break-ins / violent attacks in people's own homes in South Africa, he was given the "benefit of the doubt". In most other countries his version of events would have been considered ludicrous...