Quote:
Originally Posted by Niamh.
Well, I can't say I'm shocked at that revelation. The only thing I was ever shocked at about that case is that the judge bought his story first time round..........
|
It's been a farce, it's not even a lack of evidence issue... the scene is almost self-explanatory. Basically because of the massive (and somewhat justified) paranoia surrounding break-ins / violent attacks in people's own homes in South Africa, he was given the "benefit of the doubt". In most other countries his version of events would have been considered ludicrous...
Threaded Mode