|
0_o
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,821
|
|
|
0_o
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,821
|
Those buying the 'born in the wrong body' rhetoric are actually transphobic themselves. Thats how far this has gone.
I don't disagree with anything Murray says. I read this yesterday but didn't dare post it on here because...reasons
Sorry, I am still pretty old fashioned in that 'woman' to me means 'adult human female' and 'man' means 'adult human male'. I get that they have evolved into a 'feeling' these days. Woman can be masculine, or have surgery to look more like a male, and vice versa...but this does not alter the sex you actually are nor should it strip away protections based on that sex. Can anyone who says 'transwomen are women' define what a woman actually is for me please? A circular meaning doesn't work...as 'anyone who feels like a woman'...well, quite what are they feeling like? Its kinda like me saying 'a flobalob is a flobalob' 'but what IS a flobalob' 'its a flobalob'. Nonsense.
'Transgender' has a new meaning that not many people are aware of, meaning basically anyone can wake up one day and 'be' the opposite sex. Thats completely wrong and is a huge can of worms being opened right there. We already have had violent male prisoners locked up with females...this matter runs much deeper than the 'but its just loos!' argument.
Its not about those 'born in the wrong body' who suffer crippling dysphoria anymore. Its quite literally about anyone declaring themselves to be anything they say they are. Which is a dangerous road to go down. There is due to be a debate in parliament about allowing 'gender identity' to trump sex. I don't HAVE a 'gender identity' as I am missing this magical womanly essence (or a version of a soul...as it sounds?). I am going to be screwed eh...
Funnily enough, I know 2 transwomen in real life (both are post op) and both of those think the current day rhetoric is crazy.
Last edited by Vicky.; 06-03-2017 at 11:19 AM.
|