Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
Actually, in the context of this thread, the security risk issue was brought up by someone insisting that he is a risk. Therefore, the onus is on that person (and those who have agreed with the statement) to provide something that backs up that claim if they want it to be believed.
I think the rest of us were quite comfortable moving on with the discussion  . It's not something we haven't all heard before, unless there's something compelling to be shared on the subject, it's a bit of a pointless distraction. Or is that maybe the point? |
Unfortunately for him many consider the issue more than a 'pointless distraction'. If he wants more support he has to clarify the situation and address in detail all the evidence out there that he is a sympathiser rather that a negotiator. He wants to be PM - the onus is on him.