[user104658]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I think more to the point is that many don't trust him and therefore have no confidence in him and it us up to him and his suppporters, if they want more to vote for him, to prove he is not a security risk.

It isn't up to others to prove he is. He needs to take some responsibility here.

Actually, in the context of this thread, the security risk issue was brought up by someone insisting that he is a risk. Therefore, the onus is on that person (and those who have agreed with the statement) to provide something that backs up that claim if they want it to be believed.

I think the rest of us were quite comfortable moving on with the discussion . It's not something we haven't all heard before, unless there's something compelling to be shared on the subject, it's a bit of a pointless distraction. Or is that maybe the point?