Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie89
I feel like I keep repeating myself lol but again for me it's about competence in the role, and based on the actual description of what the role will involve I can't see how Lily's sex will automatically make her incompetent. Here's the link again which as far as I'm aware is what the role involves...
https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.ne...pdf?1445544799
That statement seems to me to be more about Lily needing to defy the preconceptions and assumptions that some will have based on her age and sex, rather than it being about her competance.
Do we really know enough about her qualifications/knowledge/training/competence to be able to say that for certain without even considering the possibility she might do a good job? Do we know if lily has actually done anything in the role that shows her to be incompetent? Do we know if the women she's dealt with have been happy with her? It all seems to be assumptions to me based on things that fall outside of what the actual role description is and it seems odd to me that those things should be ignored is all.
Which issues? Which parts of the job role are we talking about here? |
This being the main criteria I think :
The women’s officer
must be a woman.
I would think that a woman who has a womans life experiences is best suited to this part also :
Ensure that the priorities of the constituency reflect the views and concerns of women
members and women in the wider community.
Wouldn't you think it was ridiculous and insulting to black people for example, if a white man was chosen to represent the black community and put forward their concerns?
Job Description
https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.ne...pdf?1445544799