FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
27-08-2009, 02:06 AM | #1 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
2 million viewers outside of the four main terrestrial channels would be a ratings smash, but how good would their version of BB be should anyone decide to take it on after BB11?
The one thing Channel 4 has in its defence is that no other channel could or would invest as much money in the BB format as they have. |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 02:18 AM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Hello
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 02:23 AM | #3 | |||
|
||||
V.I.P
|
What utter ****ing bullshit!
If C4 were going to spend that much money on BB then we wouldnt be having this discussion and the contract would be signed for another 3 years and the Live Feed would still be here, we would have a brilliant house and 5 million viewers... But we dont! Which just proves Channel 4 didnt put enough into BB! Give it to a Channel that would care for it, and to the person who said... "2 Million wouldnt follow BB To a new channel look at CH.." Thats because CH Was the shittest thing ever and it came after the shittest series ever... Its not as if 2 million people have to get up and walk to the new studios with BB... all they have to do is get a remote and press 3 buttons |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 02:29 AM | #4 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
How is it bull****? Name me one channel that would have the resources to pull off BB, it aint a cheap show to produce.
And the live feed being axed didnt get the show cancelled, the live feed only preached to the converted (and I wanted live feed back). Im not kissing Ch4's ar*se in anyway shape or form, they made the monster then they destroyed it, Ive got nothin but contempt for Ch4, but give me an alternative other than burying it for good. |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 03:21 AM | #5 | |||
|
||||
MissKittyFantastico
|
The only TV network that could afford to run BB in the way it should be run is SKY imo, and they have already said today that they have no interest in BB.
I really can't see any other channel picking it up tbh. Sky, Ch5 (who don't have the money anyway), BBC, none of them will touch it with a bargepole. I'm so pissed at Ch4 for running a good show into the ground. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 03:25 AM | #6 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Agree, Sky might justa been able to pull it off, but theyre not interested, but I also think Sky would be too afraid to be controversial, the HL show would be edited to hell. Ch4 at least (used) to go out of their to be confrontational.
And Ch5? 2 words: The Farm |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 03:31 AM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Senior Moment
|
Look, I dont want to stub your dreams out, but 2010 is going to be the end of Big Brother
the BBC dont want it, ITV dont want it, Channel 4 dont want it, and Channel 5 dont really have the budget, Sky dont want it either. Big Brother needs a massive budget, each year, theres all the below to consider; Renovating the house Electrics Water Cameramen working 24/7 for 3 months a year Editors editing everyday Lighting for evictions Live broadcast rights The house must be constantly stocked up with food (even if the HM's dont have it) Pyschologists will have to monitor the housemates Then theres the talent (Davina ect.) Then there is 3 different studios to be built each year The there is the PRS licensing Website editors Cameras will have to be replaced Microphones have to be replaced the list could go on, but...you do get what I am saying, all the above for 3 months in one year would bankrupt a digital TV company |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 03:31 AM | #8 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Non of them are intrested apparently
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 03:31 AM | #9 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Actually just realised I made it sound like Ch4 do a good job of editing the HL show - they dont. I meant that they arent always afriad to show the controversial stuff.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 03:33 AM | #10 | |||
|
||||
Senior Moment
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 03:39 AM | #11 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Mr. Corrie I cant disagree with anything you've said, I kind of answered my own question in the first place, no channel outside of the main four could do it, too much outlay for not enough return. I guess normally you want something to go out on a high, but BB never recovered from its lows. sad, but inevitable.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 03:42 AM | #12 | |||
|
||||
Senior Moment
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 03:50 AM | #13 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
They should do allstars INSTEAD of celeb BB, then the final series can be a normal one, to see if the ratings are as bad. Preferably with normal people in it...who are not models, dont have agents, are not freaks, etc.
Also, try the last series with LF...I believe this has made a big difference |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 03:51 AM | #14 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 03:54 AM | #15 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Quote:
Yep, to be fair, the Sophies and the Karly's and the Stephanies and the Kris's etc etc etc all played their part in killing the show. The producers should never have gone down the 'wannabe' road. |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 03:58 AM | #16 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
I think the whole thing has just gotten tired and stale and it needs a new approach and fresh new ideas. Can you name one new idea that's sprung from this entire series? I've seen no new innovation or display of creativity within the production team. That really spells out to me how they feel now about the entire project.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 04:04 AM | #17 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 04:24 AM | #18 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 04:31 AM | #19 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 07:18 AM | #20 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
(this isn't everything but its ONE important thing) BB1 Drew MASSIVE nationwide interest and while it was colourful enough and featured enough 'youth culture' to grab 16-24 year olds it was really massively successful in grabbing nearly EVERYONE. But it was massively grabbed and held dear by.. Im going to call this '26-42 year olds'. Maybe more interested in what was then a more serious sociological and psychological experiment. Actually many who were old enough to remember Orwells 1984. Okay. But more to the point we started with a premise very attractive to 26 to 42 year olds. Fun enough but serious enough to grab some intellectual curiosity. Okay great forget that because HERE IS THE THING: As its most loyal dedicated established viewers were getting OLDER the series became increasingly IMMATURE. There may have even been a point where those lines crossed for a plus, but, at this point those parallel lines are too far apart now. BB1 you might have been 26 and were very intrigued by some of the social plays, the consequences of isolation, the emotional battles and 24/7 monitoring but also appreciated a tit-bird and a funny costume, but, now you are 36 and all the more intriguing socio-political psychological mysteries are gone, no new and more intriguing ones were made, but, you now get more and more tit-birds, flamboyant gays, silliness and actually the rules don't even play here with friends coming and going. Really its just an 8 week Summer party house for teenagers now. I would STRONGLY suggest that whoever takes on a new BB 'reboot' really considers investing in psychologists, sociologists to put together something which will include some much different, more complex and even more 'subtle' and overarching schemes and constructs, and, look.. you can STILL have it include young flamboyant big-titted gays too, but, something MORE challenging needs to show up here. Hey.. I said before this might even start with a new house in a rural area that does not appear to have ANY cameras and no way to tell what is a mirror or a 2-way, and, maybe they DONT hear from anyone for days and maybe the show was canceled and maybe there are rooms they 'discover by accident' that 'they believe' are not filmed, and, maybe they discover their own listening or peeping holes. What I am saying is that whoever does this really needs to stop and rethink the OPPOSITE of making it more young and gay and outrageously campy and an even bigger 'Summer Party House'. Oh and if I had any say this would be my FIRST and unbreakable rule: ABSOLUTELY NO MODEL, SINGERS, CELEBRITIES and really just saying a rule forbidding anyone who has an Agent. If you have an 'Agent' you DO NOT QUALIFY PERIOD. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 08:05 AM | #21 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
It was bound to get run down at some stage of its life no matter what channel had it. Its normal, things get repetitive as all ideas have been used. Maybe if they didnt show it for a few years then it might have a bigger impact again as there wil be new kids who never really watched it before.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 09:17 AM | #22 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I think C4 and mad for getting rid of BB just because they can't be bothered to invest time and money to inprove it. There is nothing like it on tv and they were the first to bring it to the uk. I think they should have a rethink.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 09:42 AM | #23 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 11:05 AM | #24 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Sky, ITV 2 and Channel 5 have already said they don't want it.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-08-2009, 11:09 AM | #25 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Why are so many people missing the point? The channel DOES NOT produce Big Brother, but Endemol do. If it goes to another channel, it will be the EXACT SAME SHOW, just not on C4
|
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|