[Apple202]

even when it was only happening occasionally they always posted in C+G, despite the fact it's like 3/4 down the main page

[Shaun]

probably a lurker/PBM

[Jessica.]

[Marc]

Good point. Perhaps we should change the post restriction to C&G.. 50 posts or more.

Apple for MOD tbh

[Smithy]

put his whole OP in the swear filter

[Ammi]

..maybe if we changed it to Games and Chat, it would fool him..?..

[Jessica.]

Originally Posted by Ammi

..maybe if we changed it to Games and Chat, it would fool him..?..

[Roy Mars III]

Originally Posted by Marc

Good point. Perhaps we should change the post restriction to C&G.. 50 posts or more.

Apple for MOD tbh

that's going too far, just make it so you have to get a thread approved by a mod if you're under 50 posts or so

[Novo]

Roy telling the Elders how to do their job

[Thotmas]

lol good point. A menace that still keeps to the rules by posting in the right section. They/he/she does have a little heart

[Thotmas]

Originally Posted by Roy Mars III

that's going too far, just make it so you have to get a thread approved by a mod if you're under 50 posts or so

oh that'd actually good. A lot of forums have this rule.

[Ramsay]

Roy for admin

[Marc]

Originally Posted by Roy Mars III

that's going too far, just make it so you have to get a thread approved by a mod if you're under 50 posts or so

What and make more work for us? Don't be so bloody ridiculous

[Josy]

He reads the forum, I have watched him doing it then he goes back to spamming.

[The Human Santapede]

I don;t understand why we don't implement the minimum of ten posts before making a thread rule. We have the ability to do it and if someone is serious about posting on this forum ten posts is not a lot to make.

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by ukturtle

I don;t understand why we don't implement the minimum of ten posts before making a thread rule. We have the ability to do it and if someone is serious about posting on this forum ten posts is not a lot to make.

Thisssss!

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by ukturtle

I don;t understand why we don't implement the minimum of ten posts before making a thread rule. We have the ability to do it and if someone is serious about posting on this forum ten posts is not a lot to make.

Because then he'd just spam it in threads

[Jessica.]

They could just make a hello section where you make a thread saying hello when you join and it has to be approved by a mod before they can post anywhere else.

[The Human Santapede]

Originally Posted by G.U.Yule

Because then he'd just spam it in threads

Well then the approval of posts/threads from members who have joined in the last 48 hours could be implemented. Again TiBB has that function.

[Shaun]

it would help if people stopped replying to the threads... just ignore it, or report it.

[Jessica.]

Originally Posted by Cameltoe and Wine

it would help if people stopped replying to the threads... just ignore it, or report it.

I don't think he'll be discouraged by people not replying to the threads, but honestly, it could be fixed so easily with any of the suggestions we have made,

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by ukturtle

Well then the approval of posts/threads from members who have joined in the last 48 hours could be implemented. Again TiBB has that function.

That'd be a bit difficult during on season though :/

[Jessica.]

Originally Posted by G.U.Yule

That'd be a bit difficult during on season though :/

They could hire new mods with ONLY the ability to approve threads, I would even do that if they wanted.

[The Human Santapede]

Originally Posted by G.U.Yule

That'd be a bit difficult during on season though :/

By then hopefully he would have given up

[The Human Santapede]

Originally Posted by Jessus

They could hire new mods with ONLY the ability to approve threads, I would even do that if they wanted.

This. I would go back to a mod status just to do this, not the whole dealing with arguments/infractions/crap though