FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
BB16 Big Brother 16 aka Big Brother: Timebomb started 12th May 2015, and was won by Chloe Wilburn. Discuss the housemates and show in this forum.
Housemates (tags):
Aaron,
Adjoa,
Amy,
Chloe,
Cristian,
Danny,
Eileen,
Harriet,
Harry Amelia,
Jack,
Jade,
Joel,
Kieran,
Marc,
Nick,
Sally,
Sam,
Sarah,
Simon,
HM Fan clubs (appreciation) ... Legend HMs:
Aisleyne Horgan-Wallace,
Brian Belo,
Helen Wood,
Nikki Grahame,
-- |
View Poll Results: Well...? | ||||||
First 2-3 weeks, All up vote to save, after that vote to evict | 3 | 13.64% | ||||
|
||||||
First 2-3 weeks, no evictions what so ever, after that, vote to save/evict | 5 | 22.73% | ||||
|
||||||
Vote to save from the start through out the series | 3 | 13.64% | ||||
|
||||||
Continue normally ie: vote to evict from the start | 10 | 45.45% | ||||
|
||||||
Other option, please specify | 1 | 4.55% | ||||
|
||||||
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
24-05-2015, 07:58 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Mode: Broken
|
To get the possible boring ones/quiet ones out? Instead of noms, there could be one or two immunity challenges for housemates to be able to save themselves. Maybe some other prices and stuff to get.
After two/three weeks, we would revert back to vote evict and continue the series normally. Last edited by Calderyon; 24-05-2015 at 08:03 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-05-2015, 07:59 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
His blood is bad.
|
I would be in favor of this.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-05-2015, 08:12 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Marc
|
They should have no eviction for the first week then from week 2 onwards we vote to Save/Evict
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-05-2015, 08:15 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
like the boys
|
Vote to save works better in the final stretches of a series when you know who the deadwood is and who doesn't deserve to win as a result. I don't think doing a whole house vote-to-save in the first week would work, especially if much of the early action revolves around a select group of housemates.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-05-2015, 09:41 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Vote to Save should be for big evictions when there's 8+ housemates up.
I agree with above user, I don't think there should be an eviction or nominations in the first week. Last edited by Ashley.; 24-05-2015 at 09:41 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-05-2015, 09:43 PM | #6 | |||
|
||||
As Told by Troy
|
I don't really think there's a need to change anything because there's no perfect voting system. Even most of the people who championed VTS have started to realize that it's not perfect, thankfully.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-05-2015, 10:50 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
I wouldn't like evictions without nominations for the first couple of weeks, but I would like them to wait until about Week 2 to start nominations and evictions.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-05-2015, 10:51 PM | #8 | |||
|
||||
-
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-05-2015, 10:53 PM | #9 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
As much as I detest VTE I would settle for it if they compromised by giving us two all up vote to saves at different ends of each series and made them both doubles, since that would cull the dull.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
24-05-2015, 11:08 PM | #10 | |||
|
||||
As Told by Troy
|
VTS doesn't automatically cut the dull though, it just cuts who doesn't get a lot of airtime.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-05-2015, 01:36 AM | #11 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I agree. It worked well for C4, so there's no saying why it can't work now.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-05-2015, 01:44 AM | #12 | |||
|
||||
Mode: Broken
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-05-2015, 01:53 AM | #13 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Forgive me, I'm talking rubbish.
Has it be SAVE doesn't it ? Unless the HMs all think it's vote to save (too complex !) |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-05-2015, 01:55 AM | #14 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Oh gawd.
Deleted 2nd post 1st one went too. Nevermind, great idea Calderyon ! |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|