[lewis111]

They hardly ever to head to heads - and if anyone else was up India would be safe
But NOW they've decided it's H2H as soon as it confirms India is out?

[Marsh.]

Why would they want the centre of the show out?

Funny how if they did the opposite they'd be accused of manipulation to keep India in.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Why would they want the centre of the show out?

Funny how if they did the opposite they'd be accused of manipulation to keep India in.

This lol

[lewis111]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Why would they want the centre of the show out?

Funny how if they did the opposite they'd be accused of manipulation to keep India in.

I don't think so because they normally pick the few with the most votes or more than 2 votes

The fact they changed it make it more likely it's manipulation - India is giving the show a bad name so the need her out

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by lewis111

I don't think so because they normally pick the few with the most votes or more than 2 votes

The fact they changed it make it more likely it's manipulation - India is giving the show a bad name so the need her out

This is definitely not the reason. Near everyone is talking about the show due to India. People I know who have not watched in YEARS are watching because of her. She is not making BB look bad, she is making herself (and arguably transpeople...as it seems some think a minority housemate represents the entire community) look bad.

[Ant.]

Originally Posted by lewis111

I don't think so because they normally pick the few with the most votes or more than 2 votes

The fact they changed it make it more likely it's manipulation - India is giving the show a bad name so the need her out

I don't think Big Brother even has a name anymore, let alone a bad one.

Helen Wood was controversial for essentially 10 weeks and got a lot more people riled up than India has and despite, the Ofcom complaints, BB did nothing (they could've easily snatched the pass to the final if they so wanted to). Same with Bear, they didn't try and rig it to get him out when everyone was fuming about his attitude

I highly doubt people talking about how controversial India is is making the producers quake at the concept of Big Brother getting a bad rep

[Wizard.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Why would they want the centre of the show out?

Funny how if they did the opposite they'd be accused of manipulation to keep India in.

Because they want the drama to change so other people get the spotlight and they know how hated India is.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Riley.

Because they want the drama to change so other people get the spotlight and they know how hated India is.

So, basically, the show is damned if they do and damned if they don't.

No matter WHAT they do it's seen as manipulation.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

So, basically, the show is damned if they do and damned if they don't.

No matter WHAT they do it's seen as manipulation.

If they continue down the '2 or more with the most noms are up' route then no, I would be saying they are finally consistent again. The reply to Lewis though suggests this is not going to be the case, so yes, its manipulation.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Why would they want the centre of the show out?

Funny how if they did the opposite they'd be accused of manipulation to keep India in.

Cash I guess, Most decisions on the show will be what they think is most profitable.

Its silly to deny they manipulate things to their advantage when they seem to sway between 2 or more with most up, anyone with 2 or more up, anyone with one nomination is up. Whole house up for some nosense reason. If all else fails, fake eviction.

I guess if they stick with the 2 or more with most votes is up that will be god. Maybe they have actually decided to interfere with the results less. I hope they do stick to it, but I reckon it will go back to randomness soon enough.

[andybigbro]

I can’t see people voting to save Jonny

[Owen19]

I really don’t think Jonny is that popular. If India continues to cause arguments over the next few days while he remains in the background she’ll stay.

[Epic.]

It's Farrah all over again

[bots]

how can it be manipulation when she has a 50% chance of staying, it doesnt get fairer than that

[montblanc]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

how can it be manipulation when she has a 50% chance of staying, it doesnt get fairer than that

head-to-heads essentially turn into VTE meaning that people will save one to get the other out India's WAY more hated than Jonny atm

[bots]

Originally Posted by montblanc

head-to-heads essentially turn into VTE meaning that people will save one to get the other out India's WAY more hated than Jonny atm

in which case she deserves to be gone

[Pete.]

The problem is there’s no set rule

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Pete.

The problem is there’s no set rule

This. It genuinely pains me.

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Pete.

The problem is there’s no set rule

When Emma said "Big Brother will be with you with the result shortly" I knew they were deciding on whether to make it head-to-head or whether to have Andrew & Ann up as well.

I think they know they can make a lot of money out of people voting India out so made it a head to head. Had Ann & Andrew been up, Andrew would've snatched alot of Jonny's votes and he would've gone over India. Producers were basically deciding whether they'd rather make a profit out of India's eviction or have her stay in but make less money.

[GoldHeart]

I didn't think it would go like this either. But if it's a "VOTE TO SAVE" then anything can happen .

If it was VOTE TO EVICT then surely without question India would go , but she might have more fans than Johnny so we need to save Johnny !!! .

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

I didn't think it would go like this either. But if it's a "VOTE TO SAVE" then anything can happen .

If it was VOTE TO EVICT then surely without question India would go , but she might have more fans than Johnny so we need to save Johnny !!! .

It makes literally no difference whether its vote to save or vote to evict when there are only two people up

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

It makes literally no difference whether its vote to save or vote to evict when there are only two people up

hmmm i'm not sure about that .
VOTE TO SAVE can be a nuisance as horrible people usually get saved as they still have a strong fan base . But VOTE TO EVICT is usually hm's who are disliked alot so they go .

I'll agree it's always up and down though when it comes to it . I just have a terrible feeling India will be saved .

[thisisdanny]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

It makes literally no difference whether its vote to save or vote to evict when there are only two people up

I think people are more likely to pick up the phone to evict someone they hate rather than to save someone they're unsure of for the sake of getting rid of someone they don't like. Fair enough someone popular but Jonny isn't exactly popular

[lewis111]

Big Brother have failed to comment on wether the 2 with the most noms will be up every week - saying "anything can happen"
I think this furthers my point

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by lewis111

Big Brother have failed to comment on wether the 2 with the most noms will be up every week - saying "anything can happen"
I think this furthers my point

Oh. Well then...