| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| General Chat General discussion. Want to chat about anything not covered in another forum - This is the place! |
| View Poll Results: Is “social smoking” a valid sub-designation to you? | ||||||
| Nah. If you smoke, you smoke, however infrequently |
|
2 | 18.18% | |||
|
||||||
| It is. Social smokers are of a different ilk to regular smokers |
|
2 | 18.18% | |||
|
||||||
| Depends on the frequency of the social smoking |
|
5 | 45.45% | |||
|
||||||
| Other/meh/I dunno |
|
2 | 18.18% | |||
|
||||||
| Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll | ||||||
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Redway
|
In a world of vapes and-then-some, this question’s bordering on genuinely antiquated in 2024 but blatantly cigarette-smokers are still in existence in some frequency. Question is, do you buy into the social rhetoric of “social smoking” [and/or the introverted equivalent (i.e., I’ll ask for one and smoke it quietly in the corner over a pint while I strategise internally/people-watch)]? Or does your opinion fall more into the “listen, yeah, if you smoke, you smoke, innit?” category?
__________________
![]() ![]() At Obe’s Kitchen, it’s lamb-season all-year-round, not just at Easter. I rate that. Flamingo, Fig and the Fire That Remembers. London’s shine is vast; Liverpool’s shine is textured. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|