I just thought; if that BIG BROTHER text was the only logo we are getting, surely, it'd say CELEBRITY BIG BROTHER. Just thought I'd throw some hope out there that we are actually getting an eye...

[CharlieO]

It was said early we were still getting an eye. In a newspaper, I know its not necessarily official but without the eye the whole this is a no go in my view.

[happybbfan]

The eye will be released soon.It has been designed by Daniel Eatock again.

[DigitalSid]

An eye has been confirmed on the official facebook.

[michael21]

Originally Posted by happybbfan

The eye will be released soon.It has been designed by Daniel Eatock again.

Cant wait

[Matt]

Originally Posted by mathews220

I just thought; if that BIG BROTHER text was the only logo we are getting, surely, it'd say CELEBRITY BIG BROTHER.

Not exactly hard to add it:

That took me all of five seconds

Originally Posted by DigitalSid

An eye has been confirmed on the official facebook.

If you're talking about this quote that's doing the rounds:

Guys! There will be an eye!
Our picture is not replacing the eye!
It’s the logo! .

That was posted on this fan page: http://www.facebook.com/Channel5BigBrother

The official Facebook is http://www.facebook.com/BigBrotherUK - I don't see anything on there about an eye?



All that said, I'm sure there will still be an eye - though the only evidence we've got so far is Peter Dyke's tweet.

[Lee.]

I've another idea... could you all please come here: http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=179151
And discuss the king of POP!

[T*]

Originally Posted by happyland

I've another idea... could you all please come here: http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=179151
And discuss the king of POP!

[Fat.Rat]

I reaily do like the new bb font, its bold and fresh and new, but we still have to have the eye and when its released the two 2gether will look great! x x x

[Patrick]

Originally Posted by Matt

Not exactly hard to add it:

That took me all of five seconds





If you're talking about this quote that's doing the rounds:

Guys! There will be an eye!
Our picture is not replacing the eye!
It’s the logo! .

That was posted on this fan page: http://www.facebook.com/Channel5BigBrother

The official Facebook is http://www.facebook.com/BigBrotherUK - I don't see anything on there about an eye?



All that said, I'm sure there will still be an eye - though the only evidence we've got so far is Peter Dyke's tweet.

-That awkward moment when Matt doesn't know everything for once-

The Daily Star said there would be an eye and that Eatcock was designing it back in April, they also mentioned the possibility of a new theme in the same article.

[DigitalSid]

Originally Posted by Matt

Not exactly hard to add it:

That took me all of five seconds





If you're talking about this quote that's doing the rounds:

Guys! There will be an eye!
Our picture is not replacing the eye!
It’s the logo! .

That was posted on this fan page: http://www.facebook.com/Channel5BigBrother

The official Facebook is http://www.facebook.com/BigBrotherUK - I don't see anything on there about an eye?



All that said, I'm sure there will still be an eye - though the only evidence we've got so far is Peter Dyke's tweet.

No I was on about talking about this:
http://www.facebook.com/BigBrotherUK...25945740824018
But it looks like I miss-read it.

Still the Daily Star wrote a whole article a few months ago on there being one and Peter Dyke still says there is so I would be surprised if there wasn't.

[Matt]

Originally Posted by Patrick

The Daily Star said there would be an eye and that Eatcock was designing it back in April, they also mentioned the possibility of a new theme in the same article.

Originally Posted by DigitalSid

Still the Daily Star wrote a whole article a few months ago on there being one and Peter Dyke still says there is so I would be surprised if there wasn't.

I did forget about that, but the article in question was published a long time ago

It's basically the same thing though - the only evidence we have is from The Daily Star

Originally Posted by Matt

I did forget about that, but the article in question was published a long time ago

It's basically the same thing though - the only evidence we have is from The Daily Star

The same tabloid who said we're getting live feed and an online 'big brother hub'?

[DigitalSid]

Originally Posted by Matt

Not exactly hard to add it:

That took me all of five seconds





If you're talking about this quote that's doing the rounds:

Guys! There will be an eye!
Our picture is not replacing the eye!
It’s the logo! .

That was posted on this fan page: http://www.facebook.com/Channel5BigBrother

The official Facebook is http://www.facebook.com/BigBrotherUK - I don't see anything on there about an eye?



All that said, I'm sure there will still be an eye - though the only evidence we've got so far is Peter Dyke's tweet.

Originally Posted by Patrick

-That awkward moment when Matt doesn't know everything for once-

The Daily Star said there would be an eye and that Eatcock was designing it back in April, they also mentioned the possibility of a new theme in the same article.

Originally Posted by mathews220

The same tabloid who said we're getting live feed and an online 'big brother hub'?

They were right on the hub (bigbrother.com) but not on the feed.

Originally Posted by DigitalSid

They were right on the hub (bigbrother.com) but not on the feed.

So you have inside knowledge that bigbrother.com is going to be a 'hub'? If the 'hub' doesn't have live feed, what else can it have?

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Matt

Not exactly hard to add it:



That took me all of five seconds



.

Superb!

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by DigitalSid

No I was on about talking about this:
http://www.facebook.com/BigBrotherUK...25945740824018

But it looks like I miss-read it.

.

[DigitalSid]

*misread

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by DigitalSid

*misread

It was not the spelling - typos happen.

It was more you reading something incorrectly, or reading something into things that actaully aren't there/or are untrue.

[DigitalSid]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

It was not the spelling - typos happen.

It was more you reading something incorrectly, or reading something into things that actaully aren't there/or are untrue.

I saw a list of things they were announcing and had read peter dyke's tweet about the eye and mixed the two up.

Please, keep your disagreements out of my thread. Thanks.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by DigitalSid

I saw a list of things they were announcing and had read peter dyke's tweet about the eye and mixed the two up.

Originally Posted by mathews220

Please, keep your disagreements out of my thread. Thanks.

You might want to note that both I and DigitalSid ARE discussing what has been raised on this thread.

Firstly, it was pointed out to you by another member that adding additional text to the BBlogo wasn't exactly the most difficult thing in the world to do. To emphasise their point, they showed you an example of how easy it was. I thought that was funny. I still do.

Digitalsid raising a point in this thread regarding a newspaper (well.. okay the DStar!!) article: and then had to admit he was wrong, and had misread / mixed it up it then realised it was a quote from another source - twitter. I also found that funny. Still do. I would find it as equally funny if I had to admit I was wrong... I appreciate being able to laugh at myself too.

So .... what exactly is your problem? You only want posts on this thread that you like? You will need to start up your own forum then I think.

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

It was not the spelling - typos happen.

It was more you reading something incorrectly, or reading something into things that actaully aren't there/or are untrue.

Originally Posted by DigitalSid

I saw a list of things they were announcing and had read peter dyke's tweet about the eye and mixed the two up.

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

You might want to note that both I and DigitalSid ARE discussing what has been raised on this thread.

Firstly, it was pointed out to you by another member that adding additional text to the BBlogo wasn't exactly the most difficult thing in the world to do. To emphasise their point, they showed you an example of how easy it was. I thought that was funny. I still do.

Digitalsid raising a point in this thread regarding a newspaper (well.. okay the DStar!!) article: and then had to admit he was wrong, and had misread / mixed it up it then realised it was a quote from another source - twitter. I also found that funny. Still do. I would find it as equally funny if I had to admit I was wrong... I appreciate being able to laugh at myself too.

So .... what exactly is your problem? You only want posts on this thread that you like? You will need to start up your own forum then I think.

First of all, my comment was a joke.

Secondly, I'm sure the whole of TiBB would appreciate it if you stop writing like you're writing a story to be submitted to JK Rowling, it really is pathetic and pretty laughable. I'm glad you find the logo situation amusing - small things please small minds. I have better things to do than argue with someone who is simply looking for an argument, perhaps you have need a bit of spice in your life?

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by mathews220

First of all, my comment was a joke.

Secondly, I'm sure the whole of TiBB would appreciate it if you stop writing like you're writing a story to be submitted to JK Rowling, it really is pathetic and pretty laughable. I'm glad you find the logo situation amusing - small things please small minds. I have better things to do than argue with someone who is simply looking for an argument, perhaps you have need a bit of spice in your life?

Joke my arse. As for the rest : meh!!

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Joke my arse. As for the rest : meh!!

Believe what you want, I couldn't give a flying ****. I was pretty shocked to come back and find a whole essay; just proves that you have way too much time on yours hands.

Move on with you life.