[rusticgal]

Vote to Evict clearly disposes the house of big characters...Vote to Save clearly saves them.
If Channel 5 continue with this concept surely it just encourages people to enter the house and fly under the radar...hold their emotions in. They can say what they like in their VT to get them on the show...but once they are inside the door they will shut down in fear of being voted out on the 'vote to evict' by being a big character.

[Visage]

Yes, it has to go back to VtS and with a minimum of three up each week.

[billy123]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Vote to Evict clearly disposes the house of big characters...Vote to Save clearly saves them.
If Channel 5 continue with this concept surely it just encourages people to enter the house and fly under the radar...hold their emotions in. They can say what they like in their VT to get them on the show...but once they are inside the door they will shut down in fear of being voted out on the 'vote to evict' by being a big character.

Maybe future housemates that people class as "big characters" shouldnt be so braindead and act like twats then maybe they wouldnt get evicted so quickly.
I dont class idiots as big characters if they are too stupid to not be hated they dont deserve to stay in the house.
There are still plenty of big characters in the house they just arent moronic enough to show all their cards on the first 2 weeks.

Stupidity does not make a good housemate.

[rusticgal]

When I say Big characters I refer to 'entertainment value'.... these people however 'thick' some of them are...stir things up. Sam....Sophie.....twins...Callum... Nice people but watching them is SOOOOOO boring.

[Patrick]

Why they put it back to VTE I'll never know

[smudgie]

Originally Posted by bobnot

Maybe future housemates that people class as "big characters" shouldnt be so braindead and act like twats then maybe they wouldnt get evicted so quickly.
I dont class idiots as big characters if they are too stupid to not be hated they dont deserve to stay in the house.
There are still plenty of big characters in the house they just arent moronic enough to show all their cards on the first 2 weeks.

Stupidity does not make a good housemate.

I agree, it might stop all the wannabes as well.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Visage

Yes, it has to go back to VtS and with a minimum of three up each week.

Yeah, this is the perfect formula.

[karezza]

You could have VTE and VTS. You could VTE or VTS any housemate up for eviction.

[Scream]

It is really ridiculous. I was thinking about this the other day, people will just go in there and do nothing. :l IF THEY DON'T CHANGE THIS NEXT YEAR I'LL BE MAD.

[billy123]

Originally Posted by Scream

It is really ridiculous. I was thinking about this the other day, people will just go in there and do nothing. :l IF THEY DON'T CHANGE THIS NEXT YEAR I'LL BE MAD.

Nope it will be a game for more intelligent people.
dragging it out of gutter can only be a good thing.

[CaudleHalbard]

VTE or VTS with the current nom system doesn't come into it. The dullards don't get put up by HMs for the vote anyway, so it's irrelevant.

The only way to get the boring ones out is no nominations by HMs and putting the whole house up every week. Vote to Save would then work well.

[Gstar]

BB6 says otherwise.

[BBfan46]

Ultimately, it makes no difference. People just don't take the opportunity to get rid of the boring ones when they're up - vote to save or vote to evict.

It's the general idiocy of most of BB's viewers that are the problem not the voting system.

[CaudleHalbard]

How to get the dull ones put up for eviction is the challenge.

If that can be cracked then VTS will work really well.

Any ideas?

[karezza]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

How to get the dull ones put up for eviction is the challenge.

If that can be cracked then VTS will work really well.

Any ideas?

The only solution is - don't have dull people as housemates.