[Crimson Dynamo]

The Government is aiming to protect the privacy of women and elderly
individuals and would apply to all non-residential buildings



All new buildings open to the public will have to include single-sex male and
female lavatories under plans announced by Kemi Badenoch.

Draft guidance published on Monday aims to protect the privacy of women
and elderly individuals and would apply to all non-residential buildings.

Ms Badenoch, the Minister for Women and Equalities, stated that the
Government must step in when “common sense disappears,” following a rise
in WOKE businesses offering gender-neutral toilets without separate single-sex

The proposed policy would mean a new supermarket, shop or restaurant
should have separate single-sex toilets for men and women at a minimum.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...ale/facilities.

Top Comment: “Transgender individuals should have privacy. The signage on
the door should clearly indicate what to expect.” But the trouble is they think
we believe them when they claim to be women and therefore they feel
entitled to use female only spaces. The legislation needs to be clear. Only
biological females are females, and only females can use women’s spaces.

[Cherie]

Go Kemi

[Crimson Dynamo]

[Oliver_W]

Very lavish.

[arista]

Yes the Right Move

[Liam-]

Government getting involved in private businesses and telling them what they can and can’t put in their buildings, how very authoritarian

[arista]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Government getting involved in private businesses and telling them what they can and can’t put in their buildings, how very authoritarian

No Slick Liam

Getting the UK back to being normal

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Government getting involved in private businesses and telling them what they can and can’t put in their buildings, how very authoritarian

Yes indeed, how dare they not allow men access to women while in a state of undress and vulnerable

[Liam-]

Telling companies they’re not allowed to have neutral toilets is going to stop that is it?

How easy it is for people to give full control to overreaching governments as long as it’s ‘benefitting’ them

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Government getting involved in private businesses and telling them what they can and can’t put in their buildings, how very authoritarian

Would you call adhering to government laws in Health and Safety authoritarian?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Telling companies they’re not allowed to have neutral toilets is going to stop that is it?

How easy it is for people to give full control to overreaching governments as long as it’s ‘benefitting’ them

Unless I'm reading it wrong it doesn't say they're not allowed have neutral toilets, it says they must provide single sex toilets.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Unless I'm reading it wrong it doesn't say they're not allowed have neutral toilets, it says they must provide single sex toilets.

Nope there is nothing to say they cant provide a neutral toilet, in fact it would be discriminatory to say the cannot have one, what they can no longer do is turn the women's toilet into a neutral toilet while leaving the men's for the men.....

[UserSince2005]

I’d going to put my wig on and go for a **** in the ladies hehe

[arista]

Originally Posted by UserSince2005

I’d going to put my wig on and go for a **** in the ladies hehe

You better not

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Yes indeed, how dare they not allow men access to women while in a state of undress and vulnerable

Why does this post make me think of Quagmire from Family Guy?

Maybe it's the perving over women part.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by UserSince2005

I’d going to put my wig on and go for a **** in the ladies hehe

Get with the times, you just need a pink phone case

[James]

Rishi Sunak’s government has distanced itself from the idea of a “Lavatory Tsar” after it was mocked for its new public toilets strategy.

Mr Sunak and his equalities minister Kemi Badenoch were ridiculed following a report that the government was planning to introduce a toilets commissioner to address the closure of public toilets.

But it is understood that the plan is not being considered. Although it was discussed in parliament after being raised by a Labour MP, it was rejected by the government amid fears that it would increase bureaucracy.....

From https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2392253.html

I was thinking that this could increase expensive red-tape for small businesses. A lot of cafes and the like have single-lockable toilets.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by James

From https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2392253.html

I was thinking that this could increase expensive red-tape for small businesses. A lot of cafes and the like have single-lockable toilets.

Single lockable toilets are fine, it's just those ones with stalls and communal areas outside that are the issue imo

[AnnieK]

This only relates to new buildings at the moment.

This guy explains it quite well:

Youtube video