[John.]

what if the house pictures had been taken months ago, so as too lead us onto a false trail, and the house was totally different??

I don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture changes.

And by fakes i mean properly taken and then the house changed so that it is not the same now!!

[MR.K!]

well unless they somehow faked the aerial pics too.. then...

[JOSHUAH!]

I doubt it. But if they were, I'd be mad!

[*mazedsalv**]

I doubt it. It looks real to me.

[John.]

Originally posted by KRA!G
well unless they somehow faked the aerial pics too.. then...

no i don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture

[Cody™]

Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.

[MR.K!]

Originally posted by jad22247

no i don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture

what'd be the point in that ?

[John.]

Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.

but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!

[Cody™]

Originally posted by jad22247

but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!

I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.

[John.]

Originally posted by KRA!G

what'd be the point in that ?

too fool us all, and give nothing away for this summer!!


it's like they're leavin a false trail.

EDIT: *leaving

[Conor]

Well I'd be extremely happy if the photos were fake. This is one of the worst houses yet!

[Tom]

Wasting money for the sake of a few decoration choices? It would have no impact and no speculation value.

They strategically do things like 8 beds and 8 chairs to try and fool us, not invite 60 Minute Makeover in and blow a few thousand to fool us.

[John.]

Originally posted by Cody™

I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.

why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'

[Conor]

Originally posted by jad22247

why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'

It's not stupid wasting thousands of pounds to fool about at the max 5000 people in the UK

[John.]

Originally posted by Conor
Well I'd be extremely happy if the photos were fake. This is one of the worst houses yet!

thank you Conor

[Tom]

Originally posted by jad22247

why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'

According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word

http://www.askoxford.com/results/?vi...archtype=exact

[Cody™]

Originally posted by jad22247

why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'

Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.

[Cody™]

Originally posted by Tom

According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word

http://www.askoxford.com/results/?vi...archtype=exact

HAHA thanks Tom.

[John.]

Originally posted by Cody™

Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.

but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.

[Cody™]

Originally posted by jad22247

but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.

Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?

[John.]

Originally posted by Tom

According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word

http://www.askoxford.com/results/?vi...archtype=exact

well it's not a proper word: it's like jamp.

[Tom]

Originally posted by jad22247

but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.

They usually put up camouflage nets. If they would have done that again there would have been no aerial pictures.

[Tom]

Originally posted by jad22247

well it's not a proper word: it's like jamp.

You can't argue with the Oxford dictionary. They are the people who decide what is a word and what isn't. It clearly has stupider listed under adjectives, therefore it is a word.

[John.]

Originally posted by Cody™

Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?

who builds houses? who designs them?

[John.]

Originally posted by Tom

You can't argue with the Oxford dictionary. They are the people who decide what is a word and what isn't. It clearly has stupider listed under adjectives, therefore it is a word.

well now i feel 'stupider' than Cody but its still a stupid word: