[Legend killer]

IMO she should not , if she didnt have the backbone to vote last week i don't think she should have the right to do so this week

[Jordan.]

Yeah

[Stacey.]

Yeah obviously. She just couldn't choose between two of her own acts last week, and she said she wanted to take it to deadlock..

[Angus]

Originally Posted by Stacey.x

Yeah obviously. She just couldn't choose between two of her own acts last week, and she said she wanted to take it to deadlock..

Then she's not fit to be a judge - the real reason is she didn't want to be hated for any decision she made - looks like abstaining backfired bigtime

[Smithy]

Yes, she should :L

Last week it was because she wanted to refrain from hurting her girls feelings, no other reason

[MissKittyFantastico]

Why shouldn't she?!

It was only because she didn't want to choose between her girls last week, and Simon has done the same in the past.

[tate]

Although I do understand why she opted not to last week what with being asked 2nd out of 4 judges, I agree that she should not be able to pick and choose when she wants power to eliminate

[Tom4784]

Not voting is nothing new, Sharon did it twice in the past.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Not voting is nothing new, Sharon did it twice in the past.

Exactly, the only reason people are complaining is because it was Katie in the bottom.

[Vicky.]

LOL. of course cheryl should still be allowed to vote

[Patrick]

What a stupid ******ing question.

When will half of you wise the ****** up and stop making a huge drama out of everything Cheryl does FFS!

[Adamw92]

Yes, of course she should be allowed.

[nanaimo]

yeah she should aslong as she votes katie out to make amends for her cop-out last week