[fruit_cake]

he's more fun
he doesn't have a hissy fit every five minutes
he's not a control freak
he's not a prude
he doesn't remind me of Tony Blair and look what happend with him he took us to war
if he's got nothing good to say he keeps his mouth shut
he doesn't play games with peoples feelings
he looks like Clark Kent
he's simple and straight forward

and the most important one

he'd hold his own better on the dance floor

[Deanjam]

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

he's simple

This I agree with.

[lisa12000]

Originally Posted by Deanjam

This I agree with.

haha

[karezza]

I agree:

1. He is covered in tatooes
2. He is illiterate
3. He shags ladyboys
4. He is vulgar
5. He has a red face
6. He is unintelligible
7. He is a manipulator
8. He spends Ł60 a day on food
9. He is ugly
10. He masturbates on national television

[fruit_cake]

Originally Posted by karezza

I agree:

1. He is covered in tatooes
2. He is illiterate
3. He shags ladyboys
4. He is vulgar
5. He has a red face
6. He is unintelligible
7. He is a manipulator
8. He spends Ł60 a day on food
9. He is ugly
10. He masturbates on national television

he'd hold his own better on the dance floor

^this one trumps all of those imo

[ozzyshaggah]

Originally Posted by karezza

I agree:

1. He is covered in tatooes
2. He is illiterate
3. He shags ladyboys
4. He is vulgar
5. He has a red face
6. He is unintelligible
7. He is a manipulator
8. He spends Ł60 a day on food
9. He is ugly
10. He masturbates on national television

you listed all his good points

[Livia]

Originally Posted by karezza

I agree:

1. He is covered in tatooes
2. He is illiterate
3. He shags ladyboys
4. He is vulgar
5. He has a red face
6. He is unintelligible
7. He is a manipulator
8. He spends Ł60 a day on food
9. He is ugly
10. He masturbates on national television

I'm going with this list.

He doesn't look like Tony Blair, who took us to war? Blimey fruitcake... that's the most random tenuous connection ever in the history of tenuous connections.

[joeysteele]

They are 2 so different personalities there is really no comparison between them, With Jay though it would depends on the type of lady that would go out with him, she would need a really dirty mind to put up with the garbage he spouts out.

He has good qualities obviously but his attitude to Women and what he sees them as there for are hardly any endearing qualities at all.
Near all of the Female friends I know find him disgusting when he starts about his 'conquests and graphic detailing'.

Aaron may seem duller on the surface but will certainly be a far more decent guy than Jay ever likely will be.

[karezza]

By the time Jay is 40 he will be impotent, he will have heart disease, he will have an incurable STI & will be completely bald.

[Doodleydo]

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

he's more fun
he doesn't have a hissy fit every five minutes
he's not a control freak
he's not a prude
he doesn't remind me of Tony Blair and look what happend with him he took us to war
if he's got nothing good to say he keeps his mouth shut
he doesn't play games with peoples feelings
he looks like Clark Kent
he's simple and straight forward

and the most important one

he'd hold his own better on the dance floor

Add 'he's not a complete fanny/wet drip' to the list.

Aaron is a complete and utter dullard. Waaaaaay more manipulative than Jay.
Jay is waaaaaay more entertaining than Aaron.

karezza,

1. He is covered in tatooes - So what?
2. He is illiterate - So what? (You just miss-spelt tattoos btw)
3. He shags ladyboys - Present continuous tense not really applicable
4. He is vulgar - I disagree
5. He has a red face - So what?
6. He is unintelligible - I understand him fine.
7. He is a manipulator - He isn't.
8. He spends Ł60 a day on food - So what?
9. He is ugly - He isn't, but again so what?
10. He masturbates on national television - Present continuous tense not really applicable

[fruit_cake]

Aaron is way more manipulative than Jay I can't believe anyone can't see that personally

[Deanjam]

Honestly, I don't see the appeal in either of them. But I'm a straight male so ...

[Pie]

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

Aaron is way more manipulative than Jay I can't believe anyone can't see that personally

You cant use being manipulative as negative though since you are a Rebekkah fan.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Pie

You cant use being manipulative as negative though since you are a Rebekkah fan.

I love Aaron!He's hilarious!

[Niamh.]

If you like disgusting, crude, most-likely disease ridden man-*****s then yeah I suppose so...........

[Vanessa]

Sorry,but i prefer Aaron.He's sweet,caring and funny.Not to mention drop dead gorgeous!

[Doodleydo]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

If you like disgusting, crude, most-likely disease ridden man-*****s then yeah I suppose so...........

Nobody's asking you to shack up with any of them, just be entertained by them. I think Jay has been absolutely hilarious and will only get funnier when the dullards get the boot and the focus isn't on arguments about a biscuit/pathetic fumble under the sheets.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Doodleydo

Nobody's asking you to shack up with any of them, just be entertained by them. I think Jay has been absolutely hilarious and will only get funnier when the dullards get the boot and the focus isn't on arguments about a biscuit/pathetic fumble under the sheets.

Jay is good looking,but Aaron is more my type.I like his personality better.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Doodleydo

Nobody's asking you to shack up with any of them, just be entertained by them. I think Jay has been absolutely hilarious and will only get funnier when the dullards get the boot and the focus isn't on arguments about a biscuit/pathetic fumble under the sheets.

I think you need to read the title of the Thread

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I think you need to read the title of the Thread

I think Jay has a better personality.He's just so sweet!

[Doodleydo]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I think you need to read the title of the Thread

Ah yeah! Good point.

Ok, if you want to spend your night sat next to some cardigan wearing boring old fart then Aaron is great for you, but if you want to have a bit of a laugh, I think Jay is the clear winner. I'd pick Jay every time.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Doodleydo

Ah yeah! Good point.

Ok, if you want to spend your night sat next to some cardigan wearing boring old fart then Aaron is great for you, but if you want to have a bit of a laugh, I think Jay is the clear winner. I'd pick Jay every time.

I find Aaron much more interesting than Jay.He's good looking and charming.Plus he respects women.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Doodleydo

Ah yeah! Good point.

Ok, if you want to spend your night sat next to some cardigan wearing boring old fart then Aaron is great for you, but if you want to have a bit of a laugh, I think Jay is the clear winner. I'd pick Jay every time.

If you consider wanking to an audience and listening to stories about blow drying lady juice on your face entertaining then I'd rather be a boring old fart to be quite honest.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Doodleydo

Nobody's asking you to shack up with any of them, just be entertained by them. I think Jay has been absolutely hilarious and will only get funnier when the dullards get the boot and the focus isn't on arguments about a biscuit/pathetic fumble under the sheets.

How exactly has Jay been hilarious?for you to think that of him you must remember what made him 'hilarious' care to share it?

[Doodleydo]

Originally Posted by kazanne

How exactly has Jay been hilarious?for you to think that of him you must remember what made him 'hilarious' care to share it?

Last time was his 'Strip and helicopter cock'.

And pretty much every time he's been showing doing anything/talking about anything previously.

Obviously it's different strokes for different folks, but Jay is the only one who's tickled my sense of humour enough for a proper Lol*. I think he'll be having them in kinks 99% of the time, just we only get to see the arguments storylines of fail.
*Except Aaron and 'tom having a baby'gate™ with his 'what, because of what they'd look like comment?'