[Denver]

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/tommy-robi...l?guccounter=2
2 years isnt enough

[SherzyK]

A common thug, he deserves a life sentence

[Vicky.]

But the law should not apply to him! Because..reasons! Protest, protest. So unfair. Muslims. Rargh.

[Twosugars]

There's a surprise. A common thug.

[Elliot]

[arista]

His Legal team ask for more time

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by arista

His Legal team ask for more time

That’s good of them, give him 10 years!

[Mitchell]

Good!

[Swan]

Oh he was filming the child groomers

[GiRTh]

Great news. Justice in done.

[Swan]

Im more concerned in what these disgusting child groomers get tbh.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Swan

Im more concerned in what these disgusting child groomers get tbh.

probably a slap on the wrist.

[Oliver_W]

Jail time for live streaming outside a courthouse?

If someone raised charges for assault I could understand, but getting him for something so trivial smacks of agenda.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Jail time for live streaming outside a courthouse?

If someone raised charges for assault I could understand, but getting him for something so trivial smacks of agenda.

You can't film outside of a courthouse when there are restrictions in place, to do so risks a mistrial or sensitive information such as the victims' identities being revealed. Robinson's actions could have easily caused a mistrial which would have drawn out the nightmare for the victims.

Robinson pretty much risked justice for the victims in order to raise his own profile and it's disgusting and I hope he gets those two years.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

You can't film outside of a courthouse when there are restrictions in place, to do so risks a mistrial or sensitive information such as the victims' identities being revealed. Robinson's actions could have easily caused a mistrial which would have drawn out the nightmare for the victims.

Robinson pretty much risked justice for the victims in order to raise his own profile and it's disgusting and I hope he gets those two years.

He could plead ignorance, which many would agree is probably true.

I didn't know it was illegal to film outside courthouses - I'd probably guess that it is if the question came up, but I never knew it offhand. Robinson just probably didn't know it was illegal, and if he knew the possible repercussions for the victims he probably wouldn't have done it.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

He could plead ignorance, which many would agree is probably true.

I didn't know it was illegal to film outside courthouses - I'd probably guess that it is if the question came up, but I never knew it offhand. Robinson just probably didn't know it was illegal, and if he knew the possible repercussions for the victims he probably wouldn't have done it.

Cetainly not if he knew it could have caused a mistrial....but his whole reason for being there was to show the faces of these brutal paedophiles for all to see...a bit like the paedophile hunters who get praised by many...yes he was willing to face consequences whilst filming..and perhaps after..but I doubt it was to raise his own profile...more to do with outing these beasts...who btw...all walked to court..none were brought up the stairs.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Cetainly not if he knew it could have caused a mistrial....but his whole reason for being there was to show the faces of these brutal paedophiles for all to see...a bit like the paedophile hunters who get praised by many...yes he was willing to face consequences whilst filming..and perhaps after..but I doubt it was to raise his own profile...more to do with outing these beasts...who btw...all walked to court..none were brought up the stairs.

Let's not pretend he did it for anything other than attention for his videos and streams.

The difference between peadophile hunters (when it's done right) and Tommy Robinson is that the latter aren't in it to make money, they remain anonymous and operate within the law to ensure justice is served, Tommy Robinson risking justice for those victims in order to get more views is not the same.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

He could plead ignorance, which many would agree is probably true.

I didn't know it was illegal to film outside courthouses - I'd probably guess that it is if the question came up, but I never knew it offhand. Robinson just probably didn't know it was illegal, and if he knew the possible repercussions for the victims he probably wouldn't have done it.

It's only illegal if there are restrictions in place which is usually the case when it involves minors and/or sexual abuse because of the anonymity afforded to the victims in both circumstances.

I believe he was warned that it was illegal multiple times, I remember reading that when it happened. He just valued his livestream numbers more than the law or justice.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's only illegal if there are restrictions in place which is usually the case when it involves minors and/or sexual abuse because of the anonymity afforded to the victims in both circumstances.

I believe he was warned that it was illegal multiple times, I remember reading that when it happened. He just valued his livestream numbers more than the law or justice.

That's true..I remember that as well..

The police should have stopped him long before he got his camera out if they knew...so if they didn't you should ask why.

[Beso]

Perhaps a better idea would be to have a big fat transvestite reporting on these grooming gangs, then the focus would be on what it was supposed to be on and not the fat bastard bringing it to our attention.

[Swan]

Forget the peado's, lets just go after tommy r bc it's tommy r.

So sad

[Swan]

The left view would be different if this wasn't Tommy R.

I don''t give a **** about the man, but seriously?! THESE MEN RAPED CHILDREN.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Swan

The left view would be different if this wasn't Tommy R.

I don''t give a **** about the man, but seriously?! THESE MEN RAPED CHILDREN.

Tell me something, what did Tommy Robinson do to help this case? To help this trial? Tell me.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Tell me something, what did Tommy Robinson do to help this case? To help this trial? Tell me.

Nothing. ..but it looks like he was allowed to keep doing it again again and again by the authorities so they could come to this conclusion...he ain't stupid.

He still did it....and that should be applauded....blame the authorities if it effects the case.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Nothing. ..but it looks like he was allowed to keep doing it again again and again by the authorities so they could come to this conclusion...he ain't stupid.

He still did it....and that should be applauded....blame the authorities if it effects the case.

He should be applauded for risking the anonymity of sexual abuse victims and their justice? The authorities are to blame for upholding the law and for him not taking multiple warnings seriously? Do you not see the logical gymnastics you are trying to do right now? You also seem to be confused as to what warnings are, warnings are not permission to carry on what you were doing before they are... well... warnings... It's purely illogical to blame the police for uploading the law when he had warnings not to do what he CHOSE to do repeatedly.

Will you ever actually hold Tommy Robinson responsible for his own actions or will it always be someone else's fault?