| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
|||
|
Stiff Member
|
lol
an unenforceable idea driven by cons pretending to be moral yet led by a philandering prime minister |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
It is sweet sweet sweet victory!
![]() We can't lose an iconic Chess piece. ![]() Being serious though it was an idea that was never gonna be able to be enforced imo.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
Good news
Now all we need is new porn vids I sure I watch most of them twice
Last edited by michael21; 16-10-2019 at 05:43 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
While I'm generally for less regulation, not more ... I think ISPs should automatically be in "block porn mode", and whoever pays the bills has to ask it to be lifted. #wontsomeonethinkofthechildren
__________________
![]()
|
||
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
|||
|
Banned
|
Good, I always thought it would have been the start of a very slippery path into overt censorship of the internet.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
I'm pretty sure they've finally just accepted that it's not technologically feasible (without going down a China-style firewall route)
|
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|