[Kate!]

no further details as yet.

[Mitchell]

Good, bullying is never acceptable.

[Liam-]

It’s like 2020 is trying to redeem itself

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Liam-

It’s like 2020 is trying to redeem itself

If only Bojo can f off now

[Oliver_W]

Whenever a POC is vocal they're called aggressive, and whenever a woman asserts herself she's called bossy.

She's clearly being victimised!!!

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Whenever a POC is vocal they're called aggressive, and whenever a woman asserts herself she's called bossy.

She's clearly being victimised!!!

Imagine racebaiting in defense of a proven bully, yikes.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Whenever a POC is vocal they're called aggressive, and whenever a woman asserts herself she's called bossy.

She's clearly being victimised!!!

This is the woman who said that the UK should threaten Ireland with food shortages in order to get us to drop pushing for the backstop agreement? That isn't aggressive that's ignorant and quite frankly shameful considering the history there..........

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

What about the poor staff member she drove to attempt suicide? That is a victim, not her.

Originally Posted by Niamh.

This is the woman who said that the UK should threaten Ireland with food shortages in order to get us to drop pushing for the backstop agreement? That isn't aggressive that's ignorant and quite frankly shameful considering the history there..........

Okay the sarcasm clearly didn't land

Yeah she's clearly pretty vile, I doubt she'd keep her position, let alone get it in the first place, under a reasonable PM.

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Whenever a POC is vocal they're called aggressive, and whenever a woman asserts herself she's called bossy.

She's clearly being victimised!!!

What about the poor staff member she drove to attempt suicide? That is a victim, not her.

[joeysteele]

She is unlikely to go.

I had to shudder at Hancock saying she'd always been good to work with as to him.

That's what bullies are like, they seem like butter wouldn't melt around those who are equals or above them.
To those they see beneath them, that's when their bullying side comes out.
.it seems this PM and his government haven't a clue what bullying or unacceptable behaviour really is.

She should be out.
However I doubt she will be.

I just think she in any event comes across as not a nice individual.
She has deceived and lied to parliament and to her former Prime Minister directly in her previous position.

[GoldHeart]

I thought this was actually decided. But nope she's not going anywhere is she

[arista]

Johnson Says she has broken no rules.

Kate your title is wrong

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by arista

Johnson Says she has broken no rules.

Kate your title is wrong

No point in having an inquiry at all then.
If he'll just overrule the findings and decide himself whether she has or not

Unbelievable.

Clearly the Con party is not going to respect the conclusions of this.
Which will set a very worrying agenda for the future.
Especially for any treated badly or bullied in a Con led workplace.

She should be out, instantly.
Her words would mean nothing to me, especially after this inquiry's conclusions too.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Kate!

no further details as yet.

[Oliver_W]

Has anyone heard if she's keeping her job?

[arista]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Has anyone heard if she's keeping her job?

Yes All Media

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Has anyone heard if she's keeping her job?

Johnon sent a cabinet whatsapp message telling them to



A normal government would have sacked her for the second time. We don't have a normal government.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Johnon sent a cabinet whatsapp message telling them to



A normal government would have sacked her for the second time. We don't have a normal government.

I literally thought this was a joke

What the hell is going on with our government?

I bet Sunak will be PM within a year or two, he's basically the only one who doesn't regularly embarrass the sad shower.

[arista]

[Jack_]

This man is the Prime Minister

[arista]

Yes Carry on Sorting it all out.

[arista]

[arista]

You're overreacting Slim.


She has kept her Job.
That's the importance of this thread

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

You're overreacting Slim.


She has kept her Job.
That's the importance of this thread

I'm not dude, it's just a mess in a discussion thread. Post 1 pic if you want but not multiple and constant pics over multiple pages that just end discussions as people lose track and stop reading all the posts. I think discussing how/why she has kept her job is the important factor, not seeing 474546546 massive pics of her on every page.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by arista

You're overreacting Slim.


She has kept her Job.
That's the importance of this thread

Not really.
The importance of this issue is whether it should be right for staff to be badly treated and/ or bullied in their workplace by a superior.

It seems from this, it's in order for Con superiors to do so towards those employed under them

Supporting that is not something I'd ever want to be identified with as to anyone doing so.
As this inquiry states this awful individual did.

No point of a Ministerial code or any inquiry's either if the PM can just brush it aside and do nothing.

Shocking that should be seen to be and IS.