[Elliot]

So Lewis is in the final?
I swear someone said there’s only two weeks left

[saiwong]

Isn't there always a 'surprise' eviction just before the final

[lewis111]

There’s another Friday so there will probabaly be another normal one
Unless they open VTW and evict the 2 with the least votes next Friday

[Yaki da]

There could be another one. But they've clearly decided Lewis is the winner and 3 times now this week they have done things designed to keep him in.

[BBDodge]

Probably 6 for the final so one more to remove after Friday, by fair means or foul.

[Epic.]

Originally Posted by lewis111

There’s another Friday so there will probabaly be another normal one
Unless they open VTW and evict the 2 with the least votes next Friday

Anything to keep their Lewis in

[Jack_]

PLEASE can they open the vote to win lines on Friday and give us the fitting final that at many points it looked like we'd never get

I've said for years they should bring back the week long VTW, it's about time

[RileyH]

Originally Posted by Jack_

PLEASE can they open the vote to win lines on Friday and give us the fitting final that at many points it looked like we'd never get

I've said for years they should bring back the week long VTW, it's about time

No bc that means Sian has no chance

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by RileyH

No bc that means Sian has no chance

Is that supposed to be a problem?

To coin an often used argument on here, "well the public don't like her so clearly she's not a good housemate and doesn't deserve to win!!"

[Yaki da]

Originally Posted by Epic.

Anything to keep their Lewis in

Pretty much. I believe there is actually another Friday to go after this one. Let's see how they rig it to get him through that one.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by RileyH

No bc that means Sian has no chance

More reason to do it..

[smudgie]

Make it a double this Friday.
Then votes open to save winner.

[Ant.]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Is that supposed to be a problem?

To coin an often used argument on here, "well the public don't like her so clearly she's not a good housemate and doesn't deserve to win!!"

have I been on the wrong forum for 4 years or have I just never seen this argument before?

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Lilbro

have I been on the wrong forum for 4 years or have I just never seen this argument before?

It's not a prolific one, but it is one that gets used often by certain people!

As in, the public vote is an accurate barometer in determining whether a housemate is good or not (yeah, right). People have literally said "well they WON didn't they???" before lol

[Elliot]

Originally Posted by Jack_

It's not a prolific one, but it is one that gets used often by certain people!

As in, the public vote is an accurate barometer in determining whether a housemate is good or not (yeah, right). People have literally said "well they WON didn't they???" before lol

Only one user ever says this lol

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Elliot

Only one user ever says this lol

Read the first sentence again

[RileyH]

'Certain people' is more than one user

[Ant.]

Originally Posted by Jack_

It's not a prolific one, but it is one that gets used often by certain people!

As in, the public vote is an accurate barometer in determining whether a housemate is good or not (yeah, right). People have literally said "well they WON didn't they???" before lol

It's strange, because you think such argument would apply to controversial winners such as Helen and Bear, and perhaps it has, but I've never noticed people use that defence