[Jack_]

Originally Posted by RileyH

No bc that means Sian has no chance

Is that supposed to be a problem?

To coin an often used argument on here, "well the public don't like her so clearly she's not a good housemate and doesn't deserve to win!!"

[Ant.]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Is that supposed to be a problem?

To coin an often used argument on here, "well the public don't like her so clearly she's not a good housemate and doesn't deserve to win!!"

have I been on the wrong forum for 4 years or have I just never seen this argument before?

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Lilbro

have I been on the wrong forum for 4 years or have I just never seen this argument before?

It's not a prolific one, but it is one that gets used often by certain people!

As in, the public vote is an accurate barometer in determining whether a housemate is good or not (yeah, right). People have literally said "well they WON didn't they???" before lol

[Elliot]

Originally Posted by Jack_

It's not a prolific one, but it is one that gets used often by certain people!

As in, the public vote is an accurate barometer in determining whether a housemate is good or not (yeah, right). People have literally said "well they WON didn't they???" before lol

Only one user ever says this lol

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Elliot

Only one user ever says this lol

Read the first sentence again

[Ant.]

Originally Posted by Jack_

It's not a prolific one, but it is one that gets used often by certain people!

As in, the public vote is an accurate barometer in determining whether a housemate is good or not (yeah, right). People have literally said "well they WON didn't they???" before lol

It's strange, because you think such argument would apply to controversial winners such as Helen and Bear, and perhaps it has, but I've never noticed people use that defence