[Ammi]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Like I said once you experience being attacked a few times you go on the attack yourself

It definitely won’t do her any harm being on tv

….we honestly don’t know whether Bonnie Blue has experienced any ‘attacks’ before or whether she’s just built up a ‘kick in assumption’ that an attack will happen, therefore she attacks others first in her defensiveness…or whether the defensiveness comes from a place within….we can’t assume because we just don’t know…but it wasn’t a good interview at all and didn’t seem set to achieve anything other than ‘publicity’ for Bonnie and …….ooooooo, we just got an internet sensation on the show and now we’ll trend in social media…

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

He thinks lots of sex equals a big fanny

I mean I’m gay and I even know that’s not what happens.

Just more of LTs respect for women on show for everyone I guess

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

What’s the legal age for sex in this country?

True, but tbh I think it should be 18, and I also think the minimum age to appear in pornographic material should be 21 ... but not everyone is Mother Superior and it's hard to argue those points without infantalising those involved, or looking puritanical.

[bots]

Any sexual things on the border of age legality are exploiting that border for a reason. It may be legal in the eyes of the law, but it satisfies the needs of sexual deviant viewers whose intentions are anything but innocent. What these viewers haven't twigged yet is that all sorts of data is being collected about them by people with absolutely no scruples, so they will be the ones that suffer in the long run

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by bots

Any sexual things on the border of age legality are exploiting that border for a reason. It may be legal in the eyes of the law, but it satisfies the needs of sexual deviant viewers whose intentions are anything but innocent. What these viewers haven't twigged yet is that all sorts of data is being collected about them by people with absolutely no scruples, so they will be the ones that suffer in the long run

very true

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

I mean I’m gay and I even know that’s not what happens.

Just more of LTs respect for women on show for everyone I guess

I reckon it's the excuse some people use when they're failing to get it up for their partners. "Sorry dear, we can't tonight, once a month max, too much sex will have a terrible effect on you!" he professed, as she packed her bags and headed for the door.

Not LT of course. But some poor fellas out there.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by bots

Any sexual things on the border of age legality are exploiting that border for a reason. It may be legal in the eyes of the law, but it satisfies the needs of sexual deviant viewers whose intentions are anything but innocent. What these viewers haven't twigged yet is that all sorts of data is being collected about them by people with absolutely no scruples, so they will be the ones that suffer in the long run

"Barely Legal" not too long ago was the most-searched porn category.

It's been over-taken, grimly enough, by step-sister/step-mom porn instead. The world, ladies and gentlemen.

[Glenn.]

Would you count 18 as barely legal though?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Would you count 18 as barely legal though?

The thing about this case is the filming it for paid-for porn videos. Porn can't be watched legally by anyone under 18 so it's certainly barely legal to watch one of them so to actually "star" in one??? I would say that makes this barely legal :/

[bots]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Would you count 18 as barely legal though?

i think that's missing the entire point. There is a literally endless supply of porn on the net catering for every possible category of sexual deviance. What that TV show did was encourage more deviants to go and sign up to a service that's entire purpose is to collect data about people and then exploit them for the rest of their lives. It's a much, much bigger picture than is being alluded to here

[arista]

This is Not Her.


Annie Knight,26 in Australia







https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...dailymailceleb

[Glenn.]

She’s also not a hooker…

She doesn’t get paid to have sex.

She’s paid for distribution of her videos

[UserSince2005]

These gorgeous blue eyed girls are gods gift to boys and men around the world. Just gorg.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Would you count 18 as barely legal though?

As under 18 is classed as child porn (regardless of age of consent) ... yes, both literally and morally. And that's without the 2nd grim fact that the goal is often for the 18 year old to be as young looking as possible.

That will be the case with this OnlyFans too - the ones she'll be making the most money from, at least, are the ones where the boys involved look young and inexperienced. She's not looking for the 18 year olds off the uni rugby team who are 6'3 and have a beard.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

She’s also not a hooker…

She doesn’t get paid to have sex.

She’s paid for distribution of her videos

They are both having sex with hundreds of young guys , filming themselves and selling the videos …


They are basically prostituting themselves surely !?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

Originally Posted by Zizu

They are both having sex with hundreds of young guys , filming themselves and selling the videos …


They are prostituting themselves..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

the guys they are having sex with aren't paying or they are paying in kind by allowing themselves to be videoed. That is not prostitution, by any definition

[smudgie]

Originally Posted by arista

Through this 25-year-old Hooker
£600K a month



It is about money-making
by being a outright Hooker

My only problem with this is if she is avoiding tax.
She isn’t doing herself any favours plastering her face all over the media.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Zizu

They are both having sex with hundreds of young guys , filming themselves and selling the videos …


They are prostituting themselves..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That isn’t prostitution.

She isn’t being paid to have sex.

She’s distributing/selling the videos. Like someone would sell anything.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by smudgie

My only problem with this is if she is avoiding tax.
She isn’t doing herself any favours plastering her face all over the media.

If she’s using OnlyFans she will be paying tax.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

That isn’t prostitution.

She isn’t being paid to have sex.

She’s distributing/selling the videos. Like someone would sell anything.

You can be my lawyer should I ever need one


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Livia]

She's soliciting, which is an offence in itself.

[Zizu]

Call it what you want … sex workers , porn stars , prostitution — the lines seem to be blurry
Also when your working contract involved weekly STD and aids testing it should be ringing a few balls …. sorry bells





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Call it what you want … sex workers , porn stars , prostitution — the lines seem to be blurry


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

They’re not paying her to have sex with her though.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

They’re not paying her to have sex with her though.

What about the Cambridge dictionary definition above

“ the business of having sex for money “


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Glenn.]

They’re describing prostitution which is the business of having sex for money…

She isn’t being paid to have sex there’s a difference