Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

BB10 Big Brother 10 from 2009 was won by Sophie Reade.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 26-08-2009, 02:08 AM #101
Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,078


Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,078


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by kisywisy
can i also just say that if he knew that by not nominating he'd be giving sophie and charlie a nomination, WHY didn't he just nominate them??? it makes no sense at all
What difference does it make? Either way would have the same effect
Vicky. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:13 AM #102
AhmedFan2004 AhmedFan2004 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,047
AhmedFan2004 AhmedFan2004 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,047
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by VickyJ

What difference does it make? Either way would have the same effect
NO VICKY!

Because by not nominating it makes it look like he's purposefully trying to put himself up. Especially with that explanation at the start.

If he just went in, nommed Charlie and Sophie, it wouldn't appear like that at all - No heroic portrayal, no 'I don't want free ride' ethos in action, etc.

He had to do it this way, to look cool, and get a desired 3-way eviction.
AhmedFan2004 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:14 AM #103
MissKittyFantastico's Avatar
MissKittyFantastico MissKittyFantastico is offline
MissKittyFantastico
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Gwladys Street
Posts: 21,129

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: Matt Cardle


MissKittyFantastico MissKittyFantastico is offline
MissKittyFantastico
MissKittyFantastico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Gwladys Street
Posts: 21,129

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: Matt Cardle


Default

I wish there was a banging head against wall emoticon on here.
MissKittyFantastico is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:16 AM #104
Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,078


Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,078


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
I wish there was a banging head against wall emoticon on here.
I know.

Tell me about it.
Vicky. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:17 AM #105
GypsyGoth's Avatar
GypsyGoth GypsyGoth is offline
filthy mudblood
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: that bitch caitlin's place
Posts: 50,183

Favourites (more):
BB16: Amy & Sally
X Factor 2014: Only The Young


GypsyGoth GypsyGoth is offline
filthy mudblood
GypsyGoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: that bitch caitlin's place
Posts: 50,183

Favourites (more):
BB16: Amy & Sally
X Factor 2014: Only The Young


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
I wish there was a banging head against wall emoticon on here.
Ask and you shall...
GypsyGoth is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:17 AM #106
setanta setanta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 17,574


setanta setanta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 17,574


Default

Ahmed is right on all of this though darlings.... the guy is so intent on playing the honourable soul here.... cue projectile vomit at the screen for me.
setanta is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:18 AM #107
MissKittyFantastico's Avatar
MissKittyFantastico MissKittyFantastico is offline
MissKittyFantastico
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Gwladys Street
Posts: 21,129

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: Matt Cardle


MissKittyFantastico MissKittyFantastico is offline
MissKittyFantastico
MissKittyFantastico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Gwladys Street
Posts: 21,129

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: Matt Cardle


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by GypsyGoth
Quote:
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
I wish there was a banging head against wall emoticon on here.
Ask and you shall...
In that case....



Thank you!
MissKittyFantastico is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:19 AM #108
Johann Johann is offline
FFS
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,663
Johann Johann is offline
FFS
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,663
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by setanta
Ahmed is right on all of this though darlings.... the guy is so intent on playing the honourable soul here.... cue projectile vomit at the screen for me.
.....or maybe, he just wanted to go up!
Johann is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:19 AM #109
GypsyGoth's Avatar
GypsyGoth GypsyGoth is offline
filthy mudblood
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: that bitch caitlin's place
Posts: 50,183

Favourites (more):
BB16: Amy & Sally
X Factor 2014: Only The Young


GypsyGoth GypsyGoth is offline
filthy mudblood
GypsyGoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: that bitch caitlin's place
Posts: 50,183

Favourites (more):
BB16: Amy & Sally
X Factor 2014: Only The Young


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico

In that case....



Thank you!
GypsyGoth is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:20 AM #110
MissKittyFantastico's Avatar
MissKittyFantastico MissKittyFantastico is offline
MissKittyFantastico
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Gwladys Street
Posts: 21,129

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: Matt Cardle


MissKittyFantastico MissKittyFantastico is offline
MissKittyFantastico
MissKittyFantastico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Gwladys Street
Posts: 21,129

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: Matt Cardle


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Johann
Quote:
Originally posted by setanta
Ahmed is right on all of this though darlings.... the guy is so intent on playing the honourable soul here.... cue projectile vomit at the screen for me.
.....or maybe, he just wanted to go up!
Oh God no, don't start us off on the bloody merry go round of an argument again!
MissKittyFantastico is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:20 AM #111
AhmedFan2004 AhmedFan2004 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,047
AhmedFan2004 AhmedFan2004 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,047
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by setanta
Ahmed is right on all of this though darlings.... the guy is so intent on playing the honourable soul here.... cue projectile vomit at the screen for me.
They can't defeat me on logic and they know I'll always correct them. So they give up.

Vicky missed the point entirely again. She couldn't even figure out why Vash DIDN'T just nom Charlie and Sophie.

Obvious as to why! But thanks setanta.
AhmedFan2004 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:22 AM #112
AhmedFan2004 AhmedFan2004 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,047
AhmedFan2004 AhmedFan2004 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,047
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Johann

.....or maybe, he just wanted to go up!
Yes, but not in a 2-way eviction, conveniently David needed to be in the mix. See thread title!

LOL, I best leave this thread, don't want to argue the same stuff over and over ...
AhmedFan2004 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:22 AM #113
setanta setanta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 17,574


setanta setanta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 17,574


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AhmedFan2004
Quote:
Originally posted by setanta
Ahmed is right on all of this though darlings.... the guy is so intent on playing the honourable soul here.... cue projectile vomit at the screen for me.
They can't defeat me on logic and they know I'll always correct them. So they give up.

Vicky missed the point entirely again. She couldn't even figure out why Vash DIDN'T just nom Charlie and Sophie.

Obvious as to why! But thanks setanta.
Only thing I'm agreeing with on though.... Charlie is a muppet. Don't want people to think I support him.

But yeah, everything you said about Siavash is right; they just don't want to see it.
setanta is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:23 AM #114
kisywisy's Avatar
kisywisy kisywisy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,920

Favourites (more):
BB12: Jay
CBB8: Jedward
kisywisy kisywisy is offline
Senior Member
kisywisy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,920

Favourites (more):
BB12: Jay
CBB8: Jedward
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by VickyJ
Quote:
Originally posted by kisywisy
can i also just say that if he knew that by not nominating he'd be giving sophie and charlie a nomination, WHY didn't he just nominate them??? it makes no sense at all
What difference does it make? Either way would have the same effect
exactly!! so why didn't he just nominate them?? to show that he doesn't back down?? to prove some sort of point??
kisywisy is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:24 AM #115
MissKittyFantastico's Avatar
MissKittyFantastico MissKittyFantastico is offline
MissKittyFantastico
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Gwladys Street
Posts: 21,129

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: Matt Cardle


MissKittyFantastico MissKittyFantastico is offline
MissKittyFantastico
MissKittyFantastico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Gwladys Street
Posts: 21,129

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: Matt Cardle


Default

I think it's more a case of you not actually being willing to admit you MIGHT actually be wrong about any aspect of the situation. It's not giving up, it's realising that you actually can't get your point across to some people.

Literally like banging your head against a brick wall.

None of us are mind readers, so none of us actually KNOW what Siavash is thinking or what his motives are, apart from him. We can only give our opinions, but you act as if your word is gospel or something.

And I really don't know why you seem to have a problem with Vicky. Why the need for the smug sarcasm?
MissKittyFantastico is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:25 AM #116
AhmedFan2004 AhmedFan2004 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,047
AhmedFan2004 AhmedFan2004 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,047
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by kisywisy

exactly!! so why didn't he just nominate them?? to show that he doesn't back down?? to prove some sort of point??
Because by not nominating it makes it look like he's purposefully trying to put himself up. Especially with that explanation at the start.

If he just went in, nommed Charlie and Sophie, it wouldn't appear like that at all - No heroic portrayal, no 'I don't want a free ride' ethos in action, etc.

He had to do it this way, to look cool, and get a desired 3-way eviction.
AhmedFan2004 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:27 AM #117
MissKittyFantastico's Avatar
MissKittyFantastico MissKittyFantastico is offline
MissKittyFantastico
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Gwladys Street
Posts: 21,129

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: Matt Cardle


MissKittyFantastico MissKittyFantastico is offline
MissKittyFantastico
MissKittyFantastico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Gwladys Street
Posts: 21,129

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: Matt Cardle


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AhmedFan2004
Quote:
Originally posted by Johann

.....or maybe, he just wanted to go up!
Yes, but not in a 2-way eviction, conveniently David needed to be in the mix. See thread title!

LOL, I best leave this thread, don't want to argue the same stuff over and over ...
But David did NOT need to be in the mix.

Like I keep saying, Siavash just wanted to be up himself, he was prepared for it to be a 2 way between himself or Marcus, OR a 3 way between himself, Marcus and David.

Why do you keep banging on about him wanting or needing David in the mix? Obviously it would be preferable to him not to be in a head to head but he didn't specifically plan for it to be a 3 way, if he did then he would have nominated David!

I'm so tired of this now but it's frustrating me.
MissKittyFantastico is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:28 AM #118
AhmedFan2004 AhmedFan2004 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,047
AhmedFan2004 AhmedFan2004 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,047
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico

And I really don't know why you seem to have a problem with Vicky. Why the need for the smug sarcasm?
Because if she can't figure out why he didn't just nominate Charlie and Sophie rather than 'not nominating', then she's missed the entire point.

How he wants to look like a hero by purposefully 'ensuring' that he gets put up. If he just nommed, he wouldn't look like a hero, or actively trying to put himself up. He'd be willing to potentially opt for the free ride - Going against all of his philosophy from the previous weeks.

That's why. And I'm sorry if you find me a brick wall. But that's because I've covered all the bases regarding Siavash and the conclusion is clear.

He's plotting, one way or another, most likely to make himself look heroic, AND, be safe.
AhmedFan2004 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:32 AM #119
SurferJay's Avatar
SurferJay SurferJay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 923
SurferJay SurferJay is offline
Senior Member
SurferJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 923
Default

i must say this thread has been quiet entertaining.
SurferJay is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:33 AM #120
AhmedFan2004 AhmedFan2004 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,047
AhmedFan2004 AhmedFan2004 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,047
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
But David did NOT need to be in the mix.

Like I keep saying, Siavash just wanted to be up himself, he was prepared for it to be a 2 way between himself or Marcus, OR a 3 way between himself, Marcus and David.

Why do you keep banging on about him wanting or needing David in the mix? Obviously it would be preferable to him not to be in a head to head but he didn't specifically plan for it to be a 3 way, if he did then he would have nominated David!

I'm so tired of this now but it's frustrating me.
The Vash vs Marcus thing was unlikely though, by his calculations. Even Vicky admitted this. She explained in her thread - 3 noms each.

He wanted to be up himself but didn't want a guaranteed 1 vs 1 eviction. He did this in such a way as to look good and LIKELY for David to be up.

He can't nominate David because then it's obvious he did it tactically, doesn't want to be up, does want a free ride, etc - CONTRADICTING everything he's been building up for weeks on end. Would look BAD.

All bases covered. This may be the brick wall you detest so much.
AhmedFan2004 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 02:34 AM #121
SurferJay's Avatar
SurferJay SurferJay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 923
SurferJay SurferJay is offline
Senior Member
SurferJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 923
Default

*quite
SurferJay is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 03:52 AM #122
UglyBoringMarcus UglyBoringMarcus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 81
UglyBoringMarcus UglyBoringMarcus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 81
Default

vote the minger out - see 'evict minger' post
UglyBoringMarcus is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 07:54 AM #123
WAYNEEBRUM's Avatar
WAYNEEBRUM WAYNEEBRUM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 3,500

Favourites (more):
X Factor 2009: John & Edward
Strictly 2009: Phil & Katya
WAYNEEBRUM WAYNEEBRUM is offline
Senior Member
WAYNEEBRUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 3,500

Favourites (more):
X Factor 2009: John & Edward
Strictly 2009: Phil & Katya
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AhmedFan2004
Quote:
Originally posted by setanta
Ahmed is right on all of this though darlings.... the guy is so intent on playing the honourable soul here.... cue projectile vomit at the screen for me.
They can't defeat me on logic and they know I'll always correct them. So they give up.

Vicky missed the point entirely again. She couldn't even figure out why Vash DIDN'T just nom Charlie and Sophie.

Obvious as to why! But thanks setanta.
I gave up trying to explain last night,i think deep down they know the truth but their views are clouded by the "love" of Siavash.
WAYNEEBRUM is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 09:09 AM #124
northernlight northernlight is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 43
northernlight northernlight is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
Quote:
Originally posted by AhmedFan2004
Quote:
Originally posted by Johann

.....or maybe, he just wanted to go up!
Yes, but not in a 2-way eviction, conveniently David needed to be in the mix. See thread title!

LOL, I best leave this thread, don't want to argue the same stuff over and over ...
But David did NOT need to be in the mix.

Like I keep saying, Siavash just wanted to be up himself, he was prepared for it to be a 2 way between himself or Marcus, OR a 3 way between himself, Marcus and David.

Why do you keep banging on about him wanting or needing David in the mix? Obviously it would be preferable to him not to be in a head to head but he didn't specifically plan for it to be a 3 way, if he did then he would have nominated David!

I'm so tired of this now but it's frustrating me.

I agree with you, I have been trying to work it out. I definatly think Siavash wanted to be up this week and against marcus. He knows Marcus is popular having survived evictions, just like freddie was and he lost to Marcus. Siavash knows if Marcus goes and he stays he has a chance of winning. If not he would rather go this week and get his interviews etc than go in the last week when the focus is more on the winner and then come 2nd/3rd or wherever

My theory anyway, I hope he stays
northernlight is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-08-2009, 09:22 AM #125
BBmassive BBmassive is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,299
BBmassive BBmassive is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,299
Default

EXACTLY ! Because he was lying when he said he didnt nominate because he wanted to go ,he wanted David up ,thinking he would go before him and Mucus ,if this is not the case why asked Mucus who he had voted for ?Charlie and Rod saw through this lie and spoke their mind
BBmassive is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
didn't, marcus, nominate, past, request, siavash


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts