[Mrluvaluva]

(but British scientists say 'show us your evidence')


As believers in the literal truth of the Bible, they knew it was there.

Even so, the explorers who say they found seven large wooden compartments beneath snow and volcanic debris near the peak of Mount Ararat can be forgiven their excitement.





'It's not 100 per cent that it is Noah's Ark, but we think it is 99.9 per cent that this is it,' said Yeung Wing-cheung, a filmmaker working with the 15-strong team of fundamentalist Christians exploring the Turkish mountain.

They said wood taken from the site, which is more than 13,000ft above sea level, dates to 2,800BC. If it is the ark, the discovery would be the greatest in the history of archaeology and bear out one of the most famous stories in the Bible.

The team of Turks and Chinese researchers from Noah's Ark Ministries International in Hong Kong say they made the discovery on Ararat - the biblical resting place of the ark - in October.





At a press conference yesterday to announce the discovery, another team member, Panda Lee, said: 'I saw a structure built with plank-like timber.

'Each plank was about eight inches wide. I could see tenons, proof of ancient construction predating the use of metal nails.

'We walked about 100 metres to another site. I could see broken wood fragments embedded in a glacier, and some 20 metres long.'





The structure had several compartments, some with wooden beams, the team said.

The wooden walls of one compartment were smooth and curved while the video shown by the explorers revealed doors, staircases and nails.

The team said the wood appeared to be cypress although, according to the Bible, the ark was built from gopher.

The group ruled out identifying the find as a human settlement, saying none had been found so high up in that area. They are keeping the exact location secret.

Four years ago and following a decade of research, U.S. national security analyst Porcher Taylor claimed a satellite image revealed a baffling 'anomaly' on the mountain's north-west corner that he believed to be the remains of the Ark.

But Mike Pitt, a British archaeologist, said the evangelical explorers had yet to produce compelling evidence.

He added: 'If there had been a flood capable of lifting a huge ship 4km up the side of a mountain 4,800 years ago, I think there would be substantial geological evidence for this flood around the world. And there isn't.'

Nicholas Purcell, a lecturer in ancient history at Oxford University, said the claims were the 'usual nonsense'. He added: 'If floodwaters covered Eurasia 12,000ft deep in 2,800BC, how did the complex societies of Egypt and Mesopotamia, already many centuries old, keep right on regardless?'

According to Genesis, the first book in the Old Testament, Noah was told to build the ark by God, who wanted to flood the world to punish sinners.

The story was widely seen as fact until the 19th century, when scientists began to question the evidence for a worldwide flood.


Daily Mail

[Niamh.]

ok they found a ship, but where's the proof that it was Noahs? did they find fossilized droppings of all the animals he brought on too?

[Zippy]

Turin shroud all over again.

Find any old wood or cloth and suddenly its related to things specifically mentioned in the bible. What the odds hey?

BS. Of course, believers will choose to believe.

[Z]

Regardless of what it is, I still think it's an interesting find!

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Zee

Regardless of what it is, I still think it's an interesting find!

definitely but I would love to see why they think it could be the ark though besides the date fitting

[Zippy]

Well I agree its an interesting find. Just a shame its been hijacked by the religious brigade. Now it's a case of proving that its NOT Noahs ark. When it should be about proving it IS Noahs ark.

[Angus]

It is interesting that the Ark features in the traditions of a number of Abrahamic religions, including Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and others, which gives the Noah's Ark story some credence. A lot of stories handed down through the centuries might once have had some basis in fact.