[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Zippy

You two need to get over it being a gameshow. Thats secondary. Actually, theyre NOT all there to win. Many genuinely believe they will be out after a few weeks. Some just want the BB experience to add to their life cv. Some just want enough exposure to get in Nuts( Laura).

Then there are the hardcore gamers with their eye on the prize. These are the ones who shouldnt win. Why? because they play a dishonest game. If that doesnt bother you then I give up.

I suppose you think him leading Josie on is all fine too? Thought so!

Of course they're not all there to win, I never said that. I wouldn't be there to win. What I'm saying is people that are there to win shouldn't be condemned for doing so...because like I said, it is a gameshow afterall.

Why would it bother me? It'd only bother me if they were boring as ****. As long as they are influential housemates, then I'm quite happy for them to win...gameplan or not. It's the 'nice', dull, non-entities that have won time and time again that shouldn't win.

A winner like Steve would be awful, because he has done **** all.
A winner like Corin would be good, because she has been funny + entertaining.
A winner like John James would be good, because he has been an influential housemate and has played the game.

It's that simple, really. Influential housemates > non-entities every time.

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by Jack_

A winner like Corin would be good, because she has been funny + entertaining.
A winner like John James would be good, because he has been an influential housemate and has played the game.

It's that simple, really. Influential housemates > non-entities every time.

Well I agree. But Corin hasnt targetted others with spite. She concentrates on her own game and will win on her own merits. Proof you can play a clean game.

So if it comes down to those two she would deserve it far more.

Jason and Siavash came second and I think JJ fits in far more with those two than the 10 winners!