[Zippy]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Yes, it's a social popularity show - and if the British public had any sense, the most popular housemates would be the most influential/entertaining/gameplaying ones. Because they hold the series together, and without them, it would fail. Simple as that really. Non-entities that are just 'nice' like Rachel Rice shouldn't win for the simple fact that they haven't contributed anything, really.

No, he might not need it, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't be allowed to win it. I don't need to eat cake to live but I still want it.

Originally Posted by Patrick

It's a game show, the whole aim of it is to win.

People seem to think the only way to win is to have a disability or be a nice teacher or do ****** all for 11 weeks and then say something for the last 2 weeks and gain a fan base.

Pathetic.

A good winner is someone who is playing the game and wants to win, it is a game show and people seem to forget that.

This is why Victor should of won BB 2004.

You two need to get over it being a gameshow. Thats secondary. Actually, theyre NOT all there to win. Many genuinely believe they will be out after a few weeks. Some just want the BB experience to add to their life cv. Some just want enough exposure to get in Nuts( Laura).

Then there are the hardcore gamers with their eye on the prize. These are the ones who shouldnt win. Why? because they play a dishonest game. If that doesnt bother you then I give up.

I suppose you think him leading Josie on is all fine too? Thought so!