[Kazanne]

X Factor favourite Matt Cardle reportedly 'exploded' with rage over Katie Waissel's claims that they had ended up in bed together and told her to "stop making stuff up".

It was reported yesterday that the pair got close after playing "a kissing game" in the house - but Matt is having none of it. He fumed at Katie: "I could never sleep with you."

The Sun reports the 27-year-old is convinced Katie made it all up to gain popularity before the voting closed on this weeks' show.

And insiders say that unpopular Katie has been "sucking up" to the more popular contestants.

While Matt admits they did go to his room together, he claims it was just to watch TV. He reportedly shouted at Katie after seeing the story: "What do you think you're doing? We were only watching TV - now it looks like we're an item.

"I've just come out of a relationship and I'm not about to get into another right now. Especially not with you. You're not my type.

"Stop making this stuff up. You've humiliated me and you won't have done yourself any favours."

Katie insisted she hadn't been behind the story, and according to sources, spent most of yesterday crying and being ignored by the rest of the contestants.

Matt Cardle is currently bookies' favourite to win this series of X Factor.

[Crimson Dynamo]

welcome to the world of getting paid for having people interested in what you do (or dont do).

[30stone]

Lol funny you hate this article.. yet havent said anything about what they have been saying about cher..

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by 30stone

Lol funny you hate this article.. yet havent said anything about what they have been saying about cher..

Cher doesn't interest me at all.Matt does,is that ok?and where did I say i HATE the article?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by 30stone

Lol funny you hate this article.. yet havent said anything about what they have been saying about cher..

Exactly, it's okay as long as it's about people you dislike obviously

All these articles should be discarded immediately, they're written by morally corrupt and talentless writers that failed at a serious career in journalism and are rapidly approaching the end of their relevance due to the print industry dying a slow and painful death.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Exactly, it's okay as long as it's about people you dislike obviously

All these articles should be discarded immediately, they're written by morally corrupt and talentless writers that failed at a serious career in journalism and are rapidly approaching the end of their relevance due to the print industry dying a slow and painful death.

Blimey,all i said was these tabloids should get a grip,which they should and be writing stuff that is important in the world,when did I say the story was derogotary to anyone,you need to stop being so sensitive,not all of us like Cher,so obviously will not be interested in her press!!I think some viewers need to get a grip too!

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by kazanne

Blimey,all i said was these tabloids should get a grip,which they should and be writing stuff that is important in the world,when did I say the story was derogotary to anyone,you need to stop being so sensitive,not all of us like Cher,so obviously will not be interested in her press!!I think some viewers need to get a grip too!

I just find it funny that you haven't really said anything about it when it comes to the other acts, only when it concerns Matt.

These stories are all lies anyway, to take even a pinch of any of them of truth is an insult to anyone's intelligence.

[MTVN]

Actually Kazanne, you are interested in Cher's press. I thought I remembered you saying something about the article saying she was supposedly a bully and look what I found

Originally Posted by kazanne

Front page of THE SUN a girl at school claims Cher was a vilolent bully,the girl said Cher made her life a misery for 2 years,two page spread inside.Got to read it properly as haven't had time yet,perhaps she is more like Cheryl than we thought,lol

[Crimson Dynamo]

No one, and I mean no one

Should read The Star, The Express, The Mirror or the Sun unless they realise that they are not newspapers. If you think they are then you have missed the point and should not be reading them.

Proceed with caution with the DM too.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Exactly, it's okay as long as it's about people you dislike obviously

All these articles should be discarded immediately, they're written by morally corrupt and talentless writers that failed at a serious career in journalism and are rapidly approaching the end of their relevance due to the print industry dying a slow and painful death.

i could actually see cher doing those stuff where as i cant see matt doing this.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I just find it funny that you haven't really said anything about it when it comes to the other acts, only when it concerns Matt.

These stories are all lies anyway, to take even a pinch of any of them of truth is an insult to anyone's intelligence.

I didn't say the article was truthful(we all know what the tabloids are)Of course I will pick up on stories about Matt as he is my fave,What is so funny about that?Why should I talk about people I don't care for?blimey I'de be here all day!

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Actually Kazanne, you are interested in Cher's press. I thought I remembered you saying something about the article saying she was supposedly a bully and look what I found

Exactly,so why is it so wrong to post about Matt and Katie,I did post about Cher and that headline but I never said it was true,the key word there is 'supposedly',so if something interests me i will post if that is ok with the hierachy,The tabloids are there for ALL to see,whether we chose to believe them is a matter of personal opinion,Did I say Cher was a bully?NO

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by kazanne

I didn't say the article was truthful(we all know what the tabloids are)Of course I will pick up on stories about Matt as he is my fave,What is so funny about that?Why should I talk about people I don't care for?blimey I'de be here all day!

The second sentence wasn't really referring to you but...

The first point is that I've seen you comment on negative stories about other contestants as though they're true. So it's a bit hypocritical how you react to a story about Matt when you didn't share that opinion about a story about I dunno, Cher or Katie for example.

That's the point I'm trying to make.

[cub]

The next thing we'll read is that Wagner moved out so as not be the next victim on Katie's list.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

The second sentence wasn't really referring to you but...

The first point is that I've seen you comment on negative stories about other contestants as though they're true. So it's a bit hypocritical how you react to a story about Matt when you didn't share that opinion about a story about I dunno, Cher or Katie for example.

That's the point I'm trying to make.

So where have I been negative about the other contestants other than saying i don't like a particular act,which people have a right to do,The post I posted about Cher was a while ago when the papers had her down to being a bully,I DID say on my post 'supposedly' and that I hadn't read it properly yet,as it turns out I never did get to read it so did not comment,I cannot believe I am being 'pulled' up because I posted a story about Matt and Katy,I merely pointed out the tabloids 'need to get a grip' with the stories they are running,as most of them are 'lies' and can be damaging,but saying that people did seem to buy anything bad they said about Danyl last year,so maybe they do have an effect,I thought we were allowed opinions on a forum,oh well,silly me.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by kazanne

So where have I been negative about the other contestants other than saying i don't like a particular act,which people have a right to do,The post I posted about Cher was a while ago when the papers had her down to being a bully,I DID say on my post 'supposedly' and that I hadn't read it properly yet,as it turns out I never did get to read it so did not comment,I cannot believe I am being 'pulled' up because I posted a story about Matt and Katy,I merely pointed out the tabloids 'need to get a grip' with the stories they are running,as most of them are 'lies' and can be damaging,but saying that people did seem to buy anything bad they said about Danyl last year,so maybe they do have an effect,I thought we were allowed opinions on a forum,oh well,silly me.

But you still bought into it however slightly, so it is a bit hypocritical to slam the press now. If you can't see that then I can't help you.

The opinion card really? Why is it when you've been caught out you always scream at people that we're denying you a right to an opinion? Have an opinion, I'm just pointing out the flaws in it.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

But you still bought into it however slightly, so it is a bit hypocritical to slam the press now. If you can't see that then I can't help you.

The opinion card really? Why is it when you've been caught out you always scream at people that we're denying you a right to an opinion? Have an opinion, I'm just pointing out the flaws in it.

LOL,who is screaming?It's just annoying that people read things into things that are not there,I am not asking for help,I have slated the tabloids on more than one occasion,so what are the flaws in my opinion that the 'papers need to get a grip?'imo,they do.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by kazanne

LOL,who is screaming?It's just annoying that people read things into things that are not there,I am not asking for help,I have slated the tabloids on more than one occasion,so what are the flaws in my opinion that the 'papers need to get a grip?'imo,they do.

....It's obviously gone over your head.

Right let's explain this in depth as it seems that it isn't sinking in.

MTVN quoted that post when you said that 'Cher's turning into a mini Cheryl' in response to a similar article to the one here. Despite you not reading it you still bought into the fact that you think it's true as you said that statement about Cheryl. However little you've bought into the press. So it's hypocritical that you take an anti-press POV here because it's your favourite being affected.

If you don't understand then I can't explain it any simpler. The flaw in your opinion is that you only slate the press when it concerns your favourite and that you'll buy into it if it's anyone else as evidenced by MTVN.

I'm not arguing that the papers need to get a grip, I've been saying that on here for years, I just think your stance is a bit hypocritical.