About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

headaball · 14-09-2011, 09:31 PM

They shouldn't be allowed. Bull**** noms that have got nothing to do with what has happened in the house.

D3vilish · 14-09-2011, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by headaball

They shouldn't be allowed. Bull**** noms that have got nothing to do with what has happened in the house.

He did speak about fox hunting in the house though tbh, And it might disgust people..

Not to mention theirs what we haven't seen, and if the way he acted to pamela is anything, then their reasons are valid..

Even if it was to look good in the public eye, it still happened, it still might of made people sick / angry / upset, and is a valid point.

Livia · 14-09-2011, 09:40 PM

Fox hunting is banned. Everyone feels so strongly about it that they don't even know that? He might used to hunt, but not any more.

fingers · 14-09-2011, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia

Fox hunting is banned. Everyone feels so strongly about it that they don't even know that? He might used to hunt, but not any more.

Bet he still does though! but a piss poor reason to nominate him!

Livia · 14-09-2011, 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fingers

Bet he still does though! but a piss poor reason to nominate him!

There are far too many sabs watching hunts for them to do it and get away with it for any length of time. They can drag hunt...

I think they used it as an excuse to out the posh boy. It's okay to take the pee out of someone because of their background because they consider them to be posh. If they did the same to someone else because they were working class, or ethnic, or homosexual, people would be outraged.

Roy Mars III · 14-09-2011, 09:50 PM

The housemates want to look good in the public eye. It's ridiculous, you shouldn't nominate someone for something on the outside.

Livia · 14-09-2011, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲

No it isn't, they have to shoot the fox now instead of letting a pack of dogs tear it apart. Also they are only allowed 2 dogs in a hunt.

Still brutal as hell, and I'm not condoning it in anyway.

Unfortunately, foxes have to be controlled. If they didn't shoot them, they'd poison them, which is a far worse death than a bullet.

jtalh2003 · 14-09-2011, 09:55 PM

i would have nominated him for that if i was in there tbh

and its a better reason than what that other gave"because i watched him eat a egg and i dont like eggs"

fingers · 14-09-2011, 10:02 PM

and its a better reason than what that other gave"because i watched him eat a egg and i dont like eggs"

▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ · 14-09-2011, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia

Unfortunately, foxes have to be controlled. If they didn't shoot them, they'd poison them, which is a far worse death than a bullet.

Oh I totally agree, I actually live in a rural area and have firearms licences myself (prepares to get flamed). I misunderstood, I thought you meant it has been banned outright.

They still can chase the fox on horse back though, only they can't have a whole pack of dogs any more, only two, they also can't dig the fox out, once/if it goes to ground its hunt over. What normally happens is, the fox runs until its exhausted, and just stops running and they have to shoot it, whereas before the ban they would let the dogs kill it.
It still is an absolutely disgusting and barbaric practise, and has no place in a modern society.
What you describe above is vermin control, and is perfectly acceptable IMO and also necessary.

yoshi88 · 14-09-2011, 10:30 PM

I think it is more than reason enough to nominate him. I think he is obviously a sick individual and I would have concerns for the other housemates so I really hope he does go.

Jords · 14-09-2011, 10:31 PM

Fair enough for 1 round of nominations but it shouldnt be allowed again.

yoshi88 · 14-09-2011, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jords

Fair enough for 1 round of nominations but it shouldnt be allowed again.

Fair left the building along with humanity when it comes to such perversion.

▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ · 14-09-2011, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88

I would have concerns for the other housemates

Eh...thats a bit much don't ya think? Its not like he has his shotgun in the house with him or anything.

Mores the pity

Marc · 14-09-2011, 10:35 PM

Foxes are gross anyway.

yoshi88 · 14-09-2011, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲

Eh...thats a bit much don't ya think? Its not like he has his shotgun in the house with him or anything.

Mores the pity

Not really and I certainly would not trust him to look after children. Would you trust him?

jtalh2003 · 14-09-2011, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲

Eh...thats a bit much don't ya think? Its not like he has his shotgun in the house with him or anything.

Mores the pity

you never know that might have been his 1 luxury item

yoshi88 · 14-09-2011, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc.

Foxes are gross anyway.

Compared to what humans?

Pyramid* · 14-09-2011, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fingers

and its a better reason than what that other gave"because i watched him eat a egg and i dont like eggs"

Better than that was Mark's additional comment along the lines of "he consumed it like it wasn't even there"

*Still trying to get my head round that one!!!*

headaball · 14-09-2011, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88

I think it is more than reason enough to nominate him. I think he is obviously a sick individual and I would have concerns for the other housemates so I really hope he does go.

Alex is the only one you should have concerns for. He might mistake her for some animal-based experiment that went wrong.

▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ · 14-09-2011, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88

Not really and I certainly would not trust him to look after children. Would you trust him?

Are you serious? He hunts foxes not people...

Quote:

Originally Posted by jtalh2003

you never know that might have been his 1 luxury item

I bloody well hope so, we'd have an interesting "Dodge the buckshot task" if he did

Livia · 14-09-2011, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲

Oh I totally agree, I actually live in a rural area and have firearms licences myself (prepares to get flamed). I misunderstood, I thought you meant it has been banned outright.

They still can chase the fox on horse back though, only they can't have a whole pack of dogs any more, only two, they also can't dig the fox out, once/if it goes to ground its hunt over. What normally happens is, the fox runs until its exhausted, and just stops running and they have to shoot it, whereas before the ban they would let the dogs kill it.
It still is an absolutely disgusting and barbaric practise, and has no place in a modern society.
What you describe above is vermin control, and is perfectly acceptable IMO and also necessary.

I live in the country myself, three miles from the nearest village. Everyone I know has a shotgun. I come from London though, and until you live in the countryside you really have no idea about foxes or animal control. I didn't when I moved here. Hunting with dogs for fun though... like you say disgusting and barbaric.