[MTVN]

Originally Posted by fingers

I read that as a rejected reason for nominating, were her nominations and REASONS actually aired that week?

I thought she was saying she would have used that had she still been in the house

She did nominate Jay that week anyway; "she claimed that Jay ate too much and gets “moody” when he’s hungry. Rebeckah also claimed that Jay had caused the trouble between her and Heaven." from tellymix

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by jet

The HM's have to give full and valid reasons for their nominations. This forum should be re - named the BB conspiracy theory forum.

LOL. So you think Marks reasoning of Tashie dressing like pocohontas might mean if he did something funny in the same room as her, it might not be broadcast for copyright reasons....or jays Tom offered to share his food, but I wanted it all and he wouldnt give me it are valid and full reasons?!

[fruit_cake]

seems like the whole show's a fix

[fingers]

Originally Posted by MTVN

I thought she was saying she would have used that had she still been in the house

She did nominate Jay that week anyway; "she claimed that Jay ate too much and gets “moody” when he’s hungry. Rebeckah also claimed that Jay had caused the trouble between her and Heaven." from tellymix

Acceptable rethought reasons!

[jet]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

LOL. So you think Marks reasoning of Tashie dressing like pocohontas might mean if he did something funny in the same room as her, it might not be broadcast for copyright reasons....or jays Tom offered to share his food, but I wanted it all and he wouldnt give me it are valid and full reasons?!

It was my understanding that we only see a little snippet of each nomination. It is often said that ‘so and so has been in the DR nominating for the last 20...30...40 minutes - but when it is shown, we see only seconds. So I assumed only the bare bones of the reason for the nom is shown.

[fingers]

Originally Posted by jet

It was my understanding that we only see a little snippet of each nomination. It is often said that ‘so and so has been in the DR nominating for the last 20...30...40 minutes - but when it is shown, we see only seconds. So I assumed only the bare bones of the reason for the nom is shown.

Quite! and rejected nominations are never shown (except by bad editing!)

[ibkaz]

Tom says in the vid, that he's never nomd Jay. Jay says you did 'this week' ! Tom says yeah but that don't really count as we were trying to get everyone up!....ok so why over last two days had Tom been off with Aaron? hmm because Aaron nomd Tom strange hey. Although Aaron did mess up the all up thing in end.

[Lozzibear]

Ok, I hate to ask this... but, what is fisting????

[Marmalite]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Pretty sure she said she had tried to use it as a reason to nom him but was told she couldnt...

Yes she said they wouldn't allow her to vote for Jay when she said she was voting for him because of the fisting. It was then that she said "I don't know if they have shown the fisting on the show" and Emma then said I don't think this is the place (or something) to discuss that.

Bit like freezergate really - bet he was nommed by everyone for that but gather they all got stopped as well.

[fingers]

Originally Posted by Lozzibear

Ok, I hate to ask this... but, what is fisting????

Believe me if you don't know we'd get banned for telling you!! Google is your friend and helper"