[Cherie]

The psychs seemed to be soothing Winstons ego by claiming tactical voting was the only reason he is out, if the voting really was that tactical then it should have been Christopher going over Mark as Mark was not in the running to win in the last week. The public missed out on getting Sam out last year by a tiny minority in the final eviction vote, we didn't make the same mistake this year there was an opportunity to get someone who coasted through out and people who rarely vote (like me picked up the phone and did it At least all the original housemates in the final have contributed so as long as Pav doesn't win I am okay with it.

[Tip]

They were very very kind to him - one just kindly suggested that he hadn't shown his vulnerability in there which may be a reason also why he was voted out.

Apparently he is going to be missed.

I hardly noticed him at all - so I'm just perplexed.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Tip

They were very very kind to him - one just kindly suggested that he hadn't shown his vulnerability in there which may be a reason also why he was voted out.

Apparently he is going to be missed.

I hardly noticed him at all - so I'm just perplexed.

I have not enjoyed Bit on the Psych this series, Iain Lee has been toned down too much, the show is far too sanitised, I can't identify with anything the panel say, apart from last night when Luisa told Mark what a nasty dweeb he is, the rest seem to have fake smiles plastered on their faces and just skim the surface with the evictees, boring drivel, bring back AJ

[jessicadanielle]

I don't know why everyone avoids telling Winston what he's done wrong. He's not bloody perfect, of course he's done some things wrong just like everybody else

[Denver]

I think taticall voting ruins the show thats why the ch5 era has been terrible

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by adamski94

I think taticall voting ruins the show thats why the ch5 era has been terrible

The public wanted him out, he was far too self assured, thought his muscles would win it for him, and basically did nothing for 9 weeks, if he were a good HM the campaign to get him out would never have got off the ground

[kefln]

Originally Posted by adamski94

I think taticall voting ruins the show thats why the ch5 era has been terrible

No one is forced to vote, its all voluntary.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Cherie

The public wanted him out, he was far too self assured, thought his muscles would win it for him, and basically did nothing for 9 weeks, if he were a good HM the campaign to get him out would never have got off the ground

The public have voted tatically all series to save there fav this is no longer big brother the little childish teenagers or sex obsessed people ruin it

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by adamski94

The public have voted tatically all series to save there fav this is no longer big brother the little childish teenagers or sex obsessed people ruin it

So voting to save your fav is tactical, how else would I vote?

[Tip]

Originally Posted by adamski94

The public have voted tatically all series to save there fav this is no longer big brother the little childish teenagers or sex obsessed people ruin it

Hmm and you were criticising a HM for thinking she was better than other people? It apparently isn't such a sin if you think you're in the right, or is it only good for some?

[Pete.]

He was boring and waste of space

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Tip

Hmm and you were criticising a HM for thinking she was better than other people? It apparently isn't such a sin if you think you're in the right, or is it only good for some?

This is why no normal people ever enter because the viewers

[Tip]

Originally Posted by adamski94

This is why no normal people ever enter because the viewers

Without the viewers the program wouldn't exist.

[kefln]

Originally Posted by adamski94

This is why no normal people ever enter because the viewers

Define normal?

Christopher seems fairly normal. Ashleigh is fairly normal. Pav seems fairly normal. Chris seems fairly normal.

BB has proven to be a very dangerous program in terms of how it effects peoples lives. The people that go for it tend to have an agenda, fame, money, career. Normal is relative.

[booboomartin]

Originally Posted by Cherie

The public wanted him out, he was far too self assured, thought his muscles would win it for him, and basically did nothing for 9 weeks, if he were a good HM the campaign to get him out would never have got off the ground

tactical voting by ashleigh's devotees. winston was the main housemate standing in ashleighs way (or so they think). Helen t win

[Samm]

Originally Posted by adamski94

I think taticall voting ruins the show thats why the ch5 era has been terrible

There has been tactical voting since the show started

[Jords]

They only need to check social media to see that clearly isnt the case

[Tarryn]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

He was boring and waste of space

This ^^
I wanted him out, so I voted for him to get evicted. Simple.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by ~Sam~

There has been tactical voting since the show started

By a few people but on ch4 because so many people voting it was impossible to use taticall voting to save another house but because only tens of thousands of people vote its easy to taticall vote

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Cherie

The psychs seemed to be soothing Winstons ego by claiming tactical voting was the only reason he is out, if the voting really was that tactical then it should have been Christopher going over Mark as Mark was not in the running to win in the last week. The public missed out on getting Sam out last year by a tiny minority in the final eviction vote, we didn't make the same mistake this year there was an opportunity to get someone who coasted through out and people who rarely vote (like me picked up the phone and did it At least all the original housemates in the final have contributed so as long as Pav doesn't win I am okay with it.

I think that was the reason Winston was evicted. Tactical voting. It saved Pav.

[Jules2]

If we have a favourite then we are going to try and get him/her to the finish line. Either way VTE or VTS can be used tactically until the last moment. As we are coming into the last days then to get the three we want to the top we vote to save them with one or two extra for our favourite.

Where were Marks and Winston's fanbase, truth could be that they didnt have many as they were at liberty to vote tactically as well. Where was Steven's fanbase, he would rather use negative vibes against Chris but as I say, where was his fanbase? He was one of the most disliked HMs out of all of them. They didnt save him.

[chuff me dizzy]

I voted Winston out as I didn't want him to win, simple, no tactics

[muchadoaboutnothing]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

He was boring and waste of space

This:

What really put me of him was the way he treated his so called best friend (at the time) Marlon.

[rubymoo]

Winston's done nothing! I voted him out because of this, he drove me crazy with his hyena laugh and his Jonny Bravo persona, he's not a complex person and his muscles grossed me out (they're the same thickness as his head!).

[sungrass]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I have not enjoyed Bit on the Psych this series, Iain Lee has been toned down too much, the show is far too sanitised, I can't identify with anything the panel say, apart from last night when Luisa told Mark what a nasty dweeb he is, the rest seem to have fake smiles plastered on their faces and just skim the surface with the evictees, boring drivel, bring back AJ

I get the total opposite

I really like Ian Lee but I think he should be on during the week - as BOTTS is getting a bit monotonous. He could co host on a Wednesday. I understand they are trying to lighten psyche up but there is no need. The house is an amusing environment anyway - you could have a light hearted "diary room uncut" if it got too heavy - you dont need Ian Lee there every week.

I think bit on the psyche should be one hour of the show a week that is serious - and a bit more mature (as the rest of it is all immature) and its only fair for some of us who are interested in the social experiment side of the show and who want a deeper insight into the goings on.


I would prefer for Ian to not interrupt everyone every time someone other than himself talks - I think psyche should be hosted by one presenter.

Other wise the whole thing turns into a meaningless waste of time. (last night) which must be very frustrating for the psychotherapists.

The evicted housemates dont need to be there for the whole hour,

Louisa is a waste of time. Im not interested in her opinion. WHO is she?

Davina and C4 did a much better job with this side of the show unfortunately.