| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#26 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
And shouldn't the Forum put in place as the rules that you can call a Political Party anything that you like, but just don't tag it to other Forum Members?
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#27 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
To be able to say(type) 'looney left' or 'racist right' as long as you don't call another FM these things. |
||
|
|
|
|
#28 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Quote:
But scrubbing every thread because things are said that some people might get a bit offended about... Well... Like I said. You can delete thy err words on screen but you can't delete the opinion that's in their head. I personally would rather know what a person actually thinks than have them self-centered or be censored by others. How can you form a legitimate opinion of someone otherwise? You might think they're awesome, only to find out that they've been holding back on some really, truly nasty opinions... |
||
|
|
|
|
#29 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
I'll add though that this is obviously personal preference. I've been a member of some great forums that worked this way... People REALLY get to know each other and develop mutual respect... But at the end of the day I am aware that the busiest sections of this forum are about reality TV and cat videos so I get that it has to be kept PG-13
|
||
|
|
|
|
#30 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
well lets hope anyone who supports UKIP does not get branded racist even though NONE of their policies are racist
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#31 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
Quote:
..with your last bit...that's the whole point TS, why do you need opinions on members..isn't it all about discussing topics with a wide variety of opinions and perspectives, so there is no relevance on opinions of members other than their opinions etc may not be something that you're interested in discussing with them in particular...I mean, what you're saying is that judging people is important to you in discussing something...and they're not people who are part of your own life/your 'real' life in anyway where you may thing....oh, I just can't connect to that person at all on any level so they won't be part of my life in any deep way etc...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#32 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#33 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
Quote:
...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#34 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#35 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
this particular thread was only cleaned up to remove some off topic side chat. So, it wasn't anything that added to this particular topic
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#36 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Obviously that has no bare on the voters necessarily, but it does on Farage and the rest of the party.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#37 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Quote:
I also think that getting to know members is a vital part of debating on a chat forum (this is a small chat forum,, not a hard debate forum) but I did point out that it's personal preference and also that I understand the need for pg-13 when kids might wander in. |
||
|
|
|
|
#38 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
Quote:
Every party since time began has paedos, criminals, etc as they reflect society broadly. You have to judge them on their policies and not by the odd crazy member. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#39 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#40 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
Quote:
...tit for tat and tat for tit ..(if I recall furry cuddly hamster/lions and tiger threads that have been closed as well..)...whatever this forum needs and whatever it's flaws or WHATEVER...what it needs most is a very, very heaped and overflowing spoonful od self awareness because that's exactly it and these comments that escalates and moves it so far from topic that really..?...who can be bothered, life is too short etc ..and so SD section becomes less and less appealing to anyone who wants any sense of balance and enjoyment out of the forum as well...anyways, I'm off to start my day so I'll leave you all to tit and tat and dance together......I'll have you know though that Josy is in tears right now, you trying to cut her hours and all and no consideration but a me, me, me attitude so pfffttt../unemployment figures...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#41 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#42 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Maybe it's the assumption that we're getting at each other when we're not Ammi!
"Stuff getting removed being really annoying" is one of the few topics where me and Kirk usually agree. I say something really especially mean about the old bugger, cutting to the bone, I rub my hands together gleefully, go to the kitchen to make a cup of coffee... Come back and the whole thread is gone! Before it ever had a chance to be read. It's not just frustrating it's a tragedy... |
||
|
|
|
|
#43 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#44 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
..actually I just logged back on..
..TS, what I mean in self-awareness..(and I feel that you and I do have mutual respect/whatever our topic opinions..)..is that what you want is to be able to say etc for us all to...and yet when members who don't usually post so much in SD section/younger members ..do venture over and post about something they may have an interest in...you not only tell them that it's not important in the grand scheme etc..what they're passionate about...but you ridicule, mock etc how they express themselves and really let them know that they have no place in SD as you see it...so want the 'freedom of speech' as you want it and less restrictive...but have very little tolerance for others...what they post/what they post about etc...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#45 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
the lefties took away freedom of speech. except for anyone who bashes white Christian men
|
||
|
|
|
|
#46 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
I do see mocking and ridicule usually of say JoshBB and it really grinds my gears * family guy reference #downwitthekids * I'm being very honest when I say personally I'm really happy when I see younger members in SD, not so much when it's clearly as a way to blow smoke up another member for just being a forum qween or whatever mind.Younger members are great, those who start or bleat about SD by making threads to mock or ridicule or trolling topics for the lols not so much... maybe they need a lesson in tolerance? What mock suggested was succinct and brilliantly put tbh... 'And shouldn't the Forum put in place as the rules that you can call a Political Party anything that you like, but just don't tag it to other Forum Members?' I 100% agree with that too.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#47 | |||
|
||||
|
Flag shagger.
|
Great. So I will never expect to see supporters of the Conservatives and UKIP called racists, Nazis, fascists, sheep or any other of the various insulting names I've seen people called on this forum. This is good news indeed.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#48 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
No members have been insulted in that way and it not been seen as a rule break and the member guilty infracted have they? What has been attacked is right wing ideology and press bias... nothing to do with any individual fm.
Unlike the constant stream of accusations that members are lunatics :/
__________________
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|