[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

So it would be all right if one of the guys did that to one of the girls.

Andrew may not want to make a fuss about it, can be an awkward position for a straight guy, but that doesn’t mean shane’s Behaviour was acceptable.

Gay guys can do no wrong in this PC mad world it seems, especially when they happen to be funny and entertaining. What progress,

False, Aaron(? From Joel's series) was gay and people mostly thought his ejection was deserved, because Joel reacted completely unlike Andrew.

This is completely to do with individuals, not groups. And so it should be.

[Stevep]

No two ways about it, if a guy pulled down a girl's pair of knickers he'd absolutely be warned by BB, tbh i'd go one step further, i reckon he'd be kicked out.

That said, i suspect Shane will be warned, only reason i believe he wasn't last night was because he was pissed and it was late.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Stevep

No two ways about it, if a guy pulled down a girl's pair of knickers he'd absolutely be warned by BB, tbh i'd go one step further, i reckon he'd be kicked out.

That said, i suspect Shane will be warned, only reason i believe he wasn't last night was because he was pissed and it was late.

I don't think Shane J has been given a warning , BB only called Andrew to the DR by looks of it to ask if " everything was ok" .

And For sure a man would get a warning against a woman or even kicked out i agree.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

I think we're just going round in circles here . It's not necessarily about "being offended" it's the fact that BB has put rules and warnings in place and seem to use them when it suits them rather than stay consistent to them .

And this goes for other things , like contestants getting angry and throwing tantrums in the past or giving invalid reasons for nominations. BB needs to stick to it .

Otherwise don't bother atall .

I think its more..they use them when it makes sense to use them tbh. And when two housemates are having fun and both seem extremely relaxed and enjoying it, then its a bit daft to warn.

If anything this year, a warning should perhaps have gone to Genuwine when he forced that kiss on Ashley. She looked so uncomfortable and he seemed to have hold of her head pretty hard.

It does appear to be when its housemates viewers dislike that there are warnings called for tbh. I remember when they Hazel and Daley thing happened and so many people were still saying that nothing should have happened to him, purely as they dislike Hazel. They were also calling for her to be ejected for slapping his arse or something playfully

In short, blanket rules do not really work as context is important.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I think its more..they use them when it makes sense to use them tbh. And when two housemates are having fun and both seem extremely relaxed and enjoying it, then its a bit daft to warn.

If anything this year, a warning should perhaps have gone to Genuwine when he forced that kiss on Ashley. She looked so uncomfortable and he seemed to have hold of her head pretty hard.

It does appear to be when its housemates viewers dislike that there are warnings called for tbh. I remember when they Hazel and Daley thing happened and so many people were still saying that nothing should have happened to him, purely as they dislike Hazel. They were also calling for her to be ejected for slapping his arse or something playfully

In short, blanket rules do not really work as context is important.

Are you kidding me ??? you think Ginuwine should of gotten a warning for a silly kiss ?? i'm done! .

Shane J pulling Andrew's pants down and touching his arse cheeks is acceptable!?? OK because that's that's fair .

Jemma & Sam were "having fun" in CBB20 and Sam still got a warning . So i don't care what anyone says , BB and their BS rules are inconsistent and daft .


And Callum looked embarrassed when Jasmine grabbed his crotch and nothing was done about it .

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Are you kidding me ??? you think Ginuwine should of gotten a warning for a silly kiss ?? i'm done! .

Shane J pulling Andrew's pants down and touching his arse cheeks is acceptable!?? OK because that's that's fair .

Jemma & Sam were "having fun" in CBB20 and Sam still got a warning . So i don't care what anyone says , BB and their BS rules are inconsistent and daft .


And Callum looked embarrassed when Jasmine grabbed his crotch and nothing was done about it .

No, I dont think there should have been any warnings, BUT if we are looking for reasons to warn, thats the best I can come up with

I don't remember Jemma and Sam or what happened tbh. BB give out a lot of stupid warnings though tbh

What I mean by blanket rules don't wok is...lets Say Shane L got into Jess' bed tonight and she said no, but he did not get out and Jess was uncomfortable with this. A warning could maybe be given for this. So, people would assume that from now on, if anyone got into anyone elses bed and the housemate said no there should be a warning given. So tomorrow night, Genuwine gets into Ashleys bed, she says no but is giggling on and is comfortable when she says it so clearly doesn't mean it and it just taking the piss. Should he then get a warning? So they are consistent? Context is important.

[rusticgal]

Pulling someone's underwear down to expose them is unacceptable....simples.

[blisstheassassin]

Considering that Andrew himself made clear that only his trousers were pulled down and not his underwear. I don't understand why people are still going on about underwear?

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by blisstheassassin

Considering that Andrew himself made clear that only his trousers were pulled down and not his underwear. I don't understand why people are still going on about underwear?

Andrew may not remember it because he was drunk. But we clearly saw his pants were pulled down.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by blisstheassassin

Considering that Andrew himself made clear that only his trousers were pulled down and not his underwear. I don't understand why people are still going on about underwear?

If the person whose pants were pulled down isn't making a huge fuss about it, I don't see why some people on here are.