|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050
Favourites (more):
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050
Favourites (more):
|
Again, Diana, Fergie and Kate got the same treatment from the media in the early days and beyond. Maybe people don’t remember or are too young to have been reading papers in those days, but Royal coverage was far more vicious in the past and their treatment was probably worse if anything. Meghan is not unique in any shape or form - and they did attract it by insisting on doing things their way and their way only.
Harry has always been jealous of William’s status, always….the spotlight is always on newlyweds in the family and he now had this attractive new wife and they were going to shine and modernise the monarchy single handedly…..and it had to be done NOW with attention seeking and neon lights - LOOK AT US!
….and they are NOT being vilified for leaving, they are being criticised by the way they announced they were leaving and THE WAY they left, with bad feeling and petulance, disrespect to the Queen, broken family relationships and abandoning their charities without notice….leaving others to pick up the pieces.
They could have done it all quietly if they didn’t want that life, with plans being put in place and everything worked out in advance, but no, they had to have the BIG announcement before even telling the Queen or anyone in the family.
They didn't care that at that exact time the 93 yr old Queen was having to deal with the Andrew mess and her husband was just out of hospital and very frail.
But as always, nothing is their fault... And I did squirm when I see ‘our ‘arry’ being used, it’s like looking down on people in a superior way.
|