[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

No he wasn’t because - again - he doesn’t have a personal history with those people nor does he feel like he’s been personally wronged by them in the past, resulting in bitterness, bias and having an axe to grind.

We can carry on pretending that his previous - well documented, from his own mouth in his own words - friendship with Meghan didn’t happen or wasn’t a factor but it’s just getting silly at this point. There are videos of him - not hearsay, not rumours, not “reports” - freely talking about how he felt ghosted, wronged and hurt and you’d have to be extremely naive to believe that his dented ego isn’t a large part of this story, and didn’t massively play into the behaviour that got him dismissed.

It’s fantasy land stuff. The videos are right there, and there are countless more.

I already know all this. Whoever said his friendship with Meghan didn't happen?
So because he had a personal history with her means he shouldn't be allowed to express his opinions? - which matches the opinions of many others who have no history with her. He had personal history with Trump too....and many other high profile people who he likes and yes, dislikes - I've been reading his columns for years and Meghan is far from the first he has had very strong negative opinions about....

If his ego is dented that's his problem but not really vitally relevant because it doesn't mean he is making up stuff about her - because he has never said anything at all others aren't saying, he's just more full on about it.... its not that surprising when she cultivated his friendship for ages for the doors he could open for her and then cast him aside when no longer useful like she has done with others before him?
and no, I don't think that is a massive part of what got him dismissed, because as you say, he's said about her ghosting him on many occasions on the programme without any repercussions at all.

....you ignored the part of my post that asked you a question about the interview?