[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Swan

One rule doesn't, and shouldn't fit all with most sentencing in this country. It was proven these 2 scumbags tortured and killed this little boy, hand them death. It's actually quite straight forward really.

Murder for murder, no. But in some cases i feel such a crime, when proven, should lead to evil monsters like the 2 who killed this boy to be sentenced to death.

How do you pick and choose which murderers deserve the death penalty though?

Don't get me wrong I more than understand the temptation of having one, but we can't let emotion come into it, otherwise we open our justice system up to even more anarchy than it's already in.