Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
|
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
|
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
|
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
|
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
|
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
|
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?
|
who builds houses? who designs them?
|
Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh.
27-05-2008, 10:02 PM
Threaded Mode