Quote:
Originally posted by trasadkel
Quote:
Originally posted by RobInnes
I've never been able to understand Siavash's logic of not nominating - I'm kind of with Roddy on this one (and not just cause he's my fav  ). One of the fundamental aspects of Big Brother is the nomination process and if your not prepared to do this as Siavash hasn't for quite a few weeks now, then why bother coming on the show?
In BB7 when there was about this many of them left, not one of them refused to nominate (I don't think) despite the fact that they were all close.
As well as that, rule breaking in Big Brother almost certainly guarantees you air time, so that has to be taken into consideration as well surely...?
|
I agree. I think Marcus and Siavash actions in this BB have ruined it. All I can say is after this fiasco and what BB have let people get away with this year does not bode well for BB11. Everyone will come in with the idea that they can just rebel and get away with it. It will descend into chaos.
I think the BB producers should have put their foot down with the rule breakers a long time ago. The whole concept of BB has now totally gone.
|
It's true - I've defended BB for all of the **** they've had this year, but allowing the housemates to discuss nominations was not the best idea they've ever had. It's like a five year old going "Can I have some sweets? Can I have some sweets? Can I have some sweets?" and eventualtly the irate parents gives in.
Possibly what BB was trying to do was to give the housemates the rope from which to hang themselves as they thought that everyone knowing who would nominate who would cause MASSIVE rows, which it kind of has, but not.
There was a time when BB ruled over everyone. Remember Kitten???
25-08-2009, 11:20 PM
Reply With Quote
Threaded Mode