[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by angus58

Pyramid, I am merely saying that the police had sufficient justification to take him in for questioning and they are perfectly within their scope of power to do so - he was detained within the prescribed time limits then released. Of course her BF had a key but presumably his alibi was watertight, whereas the Landlord's was not.

I don't believe I suggested they didn't have sufficient justification,nor that the police weren't within their scope of power to do so Angus. What I did say was that they have not any enough evidence to charge the man. Being a suspect doesn't mean the person is guilty.

Being on the property, having a key to the flat, not having a good enough alibi other than possibly being in on his own that fatal night - might simply have been enough for the police to bring him in for questioning, given that they clearly have not a clue what or who they are looking for, can't determine a murder weapon, where it happened, when, if she ate the pizza or not, was it a burglary or not.

As I say, it's assumption only that Joanna herself did not have a copy of a key made and gave to someone that Greg was unaware of. For all we know, Greg could have had a key made and gave it to a.n.other to do the dirty deed.... No one knows, therefore that too, reamains a possibility -no matter how slim.