Quote:
Originally Posted by SoBig
Exactly.
Amber had no business winning All-stars. Lex was upset that Rob lied to him about helping him out if he saved Amber. But Lex did the same exact thing to Jerri and Ethan a few days before. (How bad was Lex in all-stars. He killed his tribe chances at having a numbers advantage, by voting out their best swimmer(Hatch), their 2 best athletes (Ethan and Colby) plus the whole Amber thing.)
Natalie White also had no business winning Samoa. Russell clearly deserved it. In HvV it should have gone to either Parvati or Russell.
Some people can't take that they were outwitted, outplayed and outlasted. Bitter juries are a disgrace.
The whole notion that the jury can do no wrong is just stupid. The jury consist of humans and humans are known for making mistakes.
Like how the hell does Courtney get 2 votes in China? Makes no sense.
|
Amber and Natalie both deserved to win their seasons as I noted in my previous post, so I'm not going to reiterate that. Brett even played a better game than Russell in Samoa.
But what's the mistake in a Jury voting for someone to win? They choose the winner, that's the point of the game. It's not a mistake if they vote for someone to win, that's ludicrous. And besides, every Jury votes emotionally. You've spent ample time with these people, obviously feelings and emotions are going to play a part in your vote, either consciously or subconsciously. Face it, that's how human nature is.
And how does Courtney get two votes in China? Socially of course. Once again, you fail to recognize the power of social game, final Tribal Council performances, etc. You just look for the big moves and what's on the surface and think that makes a good winner. There's a reason why those people never win