[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by saiwong

I think UK BB is totally different to USA BB.

The USA version is more strategic (like Survivor) and the USA audience
enjoy strategic players whilst the UK audience frowns opon it.

I like the USA Big Brother more than the UK version.

I think the Will Kirby was a better player than Mike Malin but I still think
Janelle Pierzina should have won 'All Stars'.

As for Survivor I don't think Sandra is the best player. Sandra deserved
her first win, but I believe a bitter jury robbed Parvati Shallow of the prize.
Parvati is the best Survivor player IMHO.

I wonder if Aarons win yesterday will bring in more strategic players to
the game. Also it would be better if they changed Big Brother by removing
the public vote and having all voting done by the housemates themselves
(just like the USA version). This would make it more a gameshow rather
than a popularity contest.

Janelle's an awful player. People think she deserved to win because they like her a lot, but she's an awful strategic player.

And Parvati's far from the best ever. The bitter Jury argument doesn't really hold much substance because a Jury can't be bitter, in theory. It's all reactionary and if you're causing the Jury to act in such a way, you clearly didn't do your job as a player well. It is impossible to be an abrasive, condescending, outright asshole and win Survivor.