FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
new burglary law - is it a CON ? party election winner ? 09.10.12
thank you David Cameron, it was a GMTV with no snobbery, not often am i impressed, but fantastic are your policy's on robbery. for way to long now, the law has been favoring the criminal, the rights of the house holder will be better protected, even if there force is not minimal. David Cameron i praise, even if you are robbing the welfare vulnerable, put this aside, your robbery views make you very honorable. this will have double effect, it will firstly deter, secondly it will put the responsibility on the criminal, no more rights can they transfer. well done David Cameron, the less well off please carry on robbing, you are just as guilty as a burglar, the death of the "Con" party won't leave me sobbing. ( on one hand i agree with David C and his views on protecting your house and family against a robbery in a burglary and you being able to use what every force you want as after all - they entered your house BUT i don't agree with him robbing the most venerable in society with all these cuts as they are massively unjust and by allowing the rich to pay no higher tax on the wealth is just madness - but i can see where his priority's lie and this is why i have gone off the conservative party. but what do you think about David C and this new ruling on burglary ?) |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|