Quote:
Originally Posted by JH95
If the majority of bigger personality's on 5's BB had been saved, then I'd feel more angry. But Victoria, Chris, Benedict, Heaven, Rebeckah and so on going shows that sometimes the result wouldn't have been different with a vote to evict in place...
|
Those "bigger personalities" you listed really aren't that big.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke.
I'm not too bothered. The entertaining housemates can still survive vote to evicts if they're also likeable enough (See Rex, Freddie, Marcus, etc).
It's just the bitchy women we'll get rid of now, which pretty much continued to happen with a vote to save anyway
|
lol @ any of those people being likable. You're right about the "bitchy" women getting screwed with this but to be fair the public's sexist as a whole so women never really stood a chance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rk3388
-KK And Michael Would have been evicted instead of kirk and natalie
-Speidi would have been evicted over Paula/Gillian etc
- In BB12, Aaron would probably have been evicted at some point
Still indifferent  |
Speidi and Aaron going would've worth it so perhaps VTE will work out fine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Dagger
wat.
Charlie/Rodrigo/Sophie/David were all awful...
|
David <3 so robbed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_
BB10's final was awful, just not as awful as BB11's. It should've been made up of Marcus, Freddie, Siavash, Bea (and I hated the ****ing bitch) and Noirin.
|
eek that'd be even worse than BB11
Anyways, to answer the question I don't really think it matters. Switching to vote to save didn't even change much, people are always going to complain "well if there was a better voting system <"big character" aka huge boring asshole> would've stayed" so no matter what voting system we get people are going to bitch because it'll never go according to plan.
Threaded Mode