[halfacrown]

Originally Posted by MatthewS

Oh don't get me wrong, it's obviously 'shady' on both of their parts and certainly not the moral thing to do, I don't doubt that at all.

However, I think it's getting blown way out of proportion with relation to Hazel, whereas Daley has had a pretty easy ride. It seems like she's taking the brunt of the hostility, and I'm not sure why. At the very least, I think we can agree that the signals coming from Daley regarding his relationship status were mixed, and he was the one who initiated the escalation with Hazel by writing on her hand that he liked her. I get that people are sensitive about it and the public don't like it, but then why vote them into the safe house? The public had every opportunity to put anybody else in there, but they didn't. They flirted a lot, sure. Is that really the worst thing in the world though? Hazel got pressed and pressed by Emma on it in her interview, yet with Daley Emma was sympathetic and essentially let him say his peace and move on. Meanwhile, this is a guy who puts his hands around a womans neck and makes aggressive threats leading to him being removed from the house. It's a pretty ******ed up way of distributing 'blame' imo lol

The only reason to put them in was to see what they got up to, would they end up having sex or would they pull themselves together? Well, it went badly and it did neither of them any favours.

Because Daley lost his place in the house, he'd already received the ultimate punishment and all focus was inevitably turned onto Hazel. She was not open about why Daley was ejected to the rest of the housemates, nor did she tell them that she had got a warning. They were in disbelief about it all and, again, Hazel's stock went down.

We agree on much, but where we disagree, is on the issue of blame. BB is a popularity contest and none of the housemates have to do 'the worst thing in the world' in order to lose popularity fast. I think that Daley would have been vilified too, if he'd have stayed in.