[Cherie]

Originally Posted by smeagol

The guy has the right to live on his own with the means provided for him.
no compassion there just assume everybody has a family with tons of cash. cameron fan i guess

You completely missed my point Smeagy. I never said he didn't have the right to live on his own, and neither did I say the family should have provided cash, in fact I said quite the opposite in that where was their "support" for him (not cash based), you do not die from hunger in a week or a month, why were they not seeing him and helping him by visiting and knowing what state he was in? They sent 250.00 so they did help him out financially but given his phobia of food that didn't help as they already acknowledge in the article that he gave money away.


and no I am not a Cameron Fan! The family cannot put all blame onto the Government,(and I agree Atos are a hideous organisation) but the family are also at fault as well for not keeping a closer eye on their son/brother who they concede was vulnerable.